Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-11-2011, 08:40 AM
 
59,199 posts, read 27,403,113 times
Reputation: 14306

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
That is NOT a valid excuse to commerate him in any way shape form or fashion.
I don't know anything about the man and obviously you do.

Please give exact details as to why you think he should NOT be commemorated. Not generalities, details. What did he say, What did he do, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-11-2011, 08:44 AM
 
59,199 posts, read 27,403,113 times
Reputation: 14306
I notice those decrying this action had no peoblem with Congress honoring Sen. Richard Byrd.

"Robert Byrd became a member of the Ku Klux Klan at age 24. Not only that, he was a recruiter (“Kleagle” is the Klan term) who received $10 a head for every new member he found. According to Capitalist magazine, Byrd claimed he joined the Klan because it offered “excitement.” He also praised the KKK as “an effective force” in promoting traditional American values".

Congress honors racist Byrd
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2011, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,412,154 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post
Indeed. Recall that Sherman was also responsible for the near extinction of bison on the Great Plains after the war, and for the starvation and subsequent extermination of the tribes that depended on them for sustenance. But I have never heard any complaints.
Hence the terms, to the victor belongs the spoils, and the history.

This thread will turn into a debate on the civil war, and which side was right and wrong. In reality, both sides were very wrong for many of their actions for one reason or another.

As I've tried to point out to others, I think slavery was wrong, and the Union as a whole was wrong for supporting slavery. But that doesn't mean I have to take a negative view of slave owners and traders, because that was simply a part of America at the time. Many of the founding fathers supported slavery, traded slaves, and owned slaves. But we don't bring that up when we talk about them. The Souths leaders were slapped with the slavery label, and for some reason people can't overlook their views, even though they mirror many of America's greatest leaders views.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top