Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2011, 10:08 PM
 
11,155 posts, read 15,708,272 times
Reputation: 4209

Advertisements

Dealing with these topics is like teaching calculus to kindergartners.

Obama's administration has pulled the economy back from depression and the economy is now growing, with private sector profitable and a stock market that has almost doubled since taking off, returning it to approximately pre-collapse levels.

Yet, all you people seem capable of doing is complaining and whining. Stock markets aren't directly reflective of any one administration. They're a global speculative indicator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2011, 10:14 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
Dealing with these topics is like teaching calculus to kindergartners.

Obama's administration has pulled the economy back from depression and the economy is now growing, with private sector profitable and a stock market that has almost doubled since taking off, returning it to approximately pre-collapse levels.

Yet, all you people seem capable of doing is complaining and whining. Stock markets aren't directly reflective of any one administration. They're a global speculative indicator.

I see what you mean. You do understand that the reason the private sector is profitable is because they shed millions of workers. The reason the stock market is up is because the profits of private corporations are up, not due to top line growth but due to bottom line growth because, ta da, they shed millions of jobs.

Employers are not hiring due to economic uncertainty due to Obama's policies, tax policy, health care and crushing debt specifically.

The economic indicators are mixed, at best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2011, 11:53 PM
 
11,155 posts, read 15,708,272 times
Reputation: 4209
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
I see what you mean. You do understand that the reason the private sector is profitable is because they shed millions of workers. The reason the stock market is up is because the profits of private corporations are up, not due to top line growth but due to bottom line growth because, ta da, they shed millions of jobs.

Employers are not hiring due to economic uncertainty due to Obama's policies, tax policy, health care and crushing debt specifically.

The economic indicators are mixed, at best.
Well, when the economy collapses businesses tend to shed workers. Not sure why that's a surprise. I'd have to see proof about companies hiring or not based on your assertions before accepting or rejecting them. This issue is far more global than one nation's policies seem capable of addressing. But, perhaps. We;re clearly in recovery, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 03:11 AM
 
25,157 posts, read 53,952,004 times
Reputation: 7058
That's obvious to me too: except it is not possible that we are in recovery. Where do you get that flighty thought from?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
Well, when the economy collapses businesses tend to shed workers. Not sure why that's a surprise. I'd have to see proof about companies hiring or not based on your assertions before accepting or rejecting them. This issue is far more global than one nation's policies seem capable of addressing. But, perhaps. We;re clearly in recovery, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 05:24 AM
 
12,905 posts, read 15,662,473 times
Reputation: 9394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
Well, when the economy collapses businesses tend to shed workers. Not sure why that's a surprise. I'd have to see proof about companies hiring or not based on your assertions before accepting or rejecting them. This issue is far more global than one nation's policies seem capable of addressing. But, perhaps. We;re clearly in recovery, though.
To be frank here, I speculate that many companies (not necessarily mom and pop) have discovered how desparate the American people are for a job and ANY kind of wage. They discovered, through this recession, that they can work less people, harder, for less money and keep their business going and earning more profits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 05:36 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,054,479 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by bababua View Post
Lets see Obama haters you want Bushy Junior stock market or this one? What what a great job by Obama. I love to hear the spin on this one. This market is rolling and jobs as usual will follow as a lagging indicator. Great Job Obama!!!
The stock market is an indicator of profits.

Less labor costs equals greater profits.

Also, don't forget about the $800 BILLION DOLLARS that were dumped into the system under the guise of "stimulus".

Don't forget about the TRILLION DOLLAR TARP that was dumped into the system to bail out bank and others.

You cannot dump $2 TRILLION DOLLARS into the system without creating some effect.

Great job barry! You managed to "invest" $2 TRILLION DOLLARS and didn't create one job.

Main street suffers while Wall street thrives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 05:36 AM
 
1,931 posts, read 3,414,290 times
Reputation: 956
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
The market is doing better because of quantitative easing. Open your eyes to government manipulation.

You want to be fancy and use quantitative easing I say hell they gave them money but whatever you say I know your porfolio or retirement account is much much much better then it was at the end of Bush. Sorry if you cant see that. Bush did a good job by starting the fancy shmancy quantitative easing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 06:02 AM
 
Location: Orlando
8,276 posts, read 12,861,779 times
Reputation: 4142
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Well, let's see. The Bushy stock market was just shy of 14,000 at one point, so yeah, I'd rather have the Bush SM.

And I seem to remember the Left vehemently denying the stock market had anything at all to do with the state of the economy at the time.
I have no doubt in your warped mind you see things this way, however there is reality

The end of the Bush stock market | Analysis & Opinion |

or if you prefer

STOCK MARKET: OBAMA vs BUSH | Angry Bear

Clinton added huge amounts to the market and that continued into the first few years of bush, then it turned South in a HUGE way. under Obama it has recovered to the point slightly above where Clinton left it.

Bush did nothing good for our economy. Market way down, millions of lost jobs, auto industry imploding along with housing, and banking... the fundamentals of our economy. His staff netted 10's of millions as the pocket books of the people evaporated.

Sorry, There is nothing to sugar coat the Bush years. He was the worse president of 44 and damaged the country more than any other.. No matter how much lipstick you put on this pig it is nonetheless a pig.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by bababua View Post
You want to be fancy and use quantitative easing I say hell they gave them money but whatever you say I know your porfolio or retirement account is much much much better then it was at the end of Bush. Sorry if you cant see that. Bush did a good job by starting the fancy shmancy quantitative easing.
It was inevitable the market would rebound. I don't think most have recovered to their pre crash status. I did have a little cash around during the crash, invested that and made a small profit. Little, small. HOWEVER who had money to invest when the market crashed? I didn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 06:49 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
It was inevitable the market would rebound. I don't think most have recovered to their pre crash status. I did have a little cash around during the crash, invested that and made a small profit. Little, small. HOWEVER who had money to invest when the market crashed? I didn't.
You know what, it doesn't matter. The stock market is essentially a casino. You can make money when the market goes down, through shorting or buying other products that generally move opposite the market, like bonds or commodities.

You can make money in an bull market by going long equities.

The bottom line is the market reflects the profitability of companies. A companies profitability does not always reflect the economy. Such as in this instance. Companies are accumulating cash, not re investing in their businesses. There is $2 trillion in cash on the sidelines because companies don't know what tax policy and health care will cost them. Hiring is not happening, and inflation is now looming. We may be in a recovery, but it is one of the most anemic in history despite historic amounts of money spent and huge amount of dollars pumped out by the Fed.

Do not be deluded into thinking the economy is in good shape or will be in the near future.

If spending continues it is a lock we are headed for a double dip.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top