Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:37 AM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14285

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
The Democrats didn't have much choice in the matter in Wisconsin in the assembly (house). Even if all of them walked out, the Republicans could still vote.

The Senate has rules similar to the filibuster, that if none of the Democratic Senators are there, then the Senate can't be called to order, and thus it stops government.

Its up to the people of Wisconsin on what they want. I've seen conflicting polls. Most folks want the Union to pay for their benefits, but they don't seem to support the collective bargaining ban in the same numbers.

Its their states thing, and I'll let them decide. It doesn't make a difference to me. I know if my state governor called for the police to track down Senators and force them to vote, I'd be one mad SOB.
Why would you be mad?

These people were elected to do a job. The job location is in the capitol casting votes. They should be there.

By your reasoning all minority members, city, county state federal, need not ever show up because the majority is going to out vote them.

That is not the way to run a government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:41 AM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
Actually the Right's days are numbered. The long term demographics work against them and they are alienating many people in the Midwest where the labor movement is stronger than any other part of the country. This move is going to cost the Republicans the 2012 presidental election.
IMO, you are way wrong. There are many more non gov't employees than there are gov't employees.

In these states the voters elected the repubs over the dems who had been in charge for years because their states are broke and the dems are seen as tax and spend. The people have had enough. The people want to get their states back to fiscal solvency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:44 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,561 posts, read 17,237,701 times
Reputation: 17603
Default hijacked unions subsidize the Dems...

Decades of support of the Dems by the unions finally got in the way of sensible economic reform. the Dems will lose their main supply of cash not because of political intent but because it was a poor economic practice. Loss of the Dems faucet to taxpayer money via unions is a lucky side effect.

Claims of union busting are ridiculous as the unions can still exist but on their own merit instead of mandating compulsory membership.

The unions happen to build their house in the path of a future economic freeway. It sure must feel like union busting to the dems and union elite but to the taxpayers and union members it finally looks like they get a say as to where their hard earned money goes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:44 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
Wis. Assembly passes bill taking away union rights
Wis. Assembly passes bill taking away union rights - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_wisconsin_budget_unions - broken link)

Republican-controlled Wisconsin Assembly passes anti-union bill despite protests
The Canadian Press: Wisconsin Assembly passes bill taking away union rights despite protests

Wisconsin Assembly Passes Anti-Union Bill
Wisconsin Assembly Passes Anti-Union Bill - FoxNews.com


Union rights???


Is it really a right if it can be granted and taken away?

It is a privilege, nothing else. Abuse your privilege and it is taken away.
Rights can never be taken away or even discussed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:45 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,207,970 times
Reputation: 3411
Do you people just make up stuff to deliberately mislead people? They haven't trashed the capital--they're keeping it amazingly clean--volunteers are scrubbing floors, cleaning bathrooms, and buying supplies out of their own pockets to take care of the capital. I'd take the reports with a grain of salt, except that I have two sisters who've BEEN THERE. Again--they've kept it amazingly clean.


Why do some of you purposely make stuff up?

Talya Minsberg: Wisconsin Protests -- Life in the Trenches
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:49 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,207,970 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
Actually the Right's days are numbered. The long term demographics work against them and they are alienating many people in the Midwest where the labor movement is stronger than any other part of the country. This move is going to cost the Republicans the 2012 presidental election.
That's just it. There are lots of fairly moderate republican union members out here (I live in the midwest) and they're TICKED OFF about this. We didn't vote for this kind of garbage.

You know the strategy being floated around with many of the moderate R's? Take back the party. Work hard for moderate candidates in the primary, and if a radical gets nominated--vote for the Democrat in the general. You want to see an uprising by the middle class? Watch a voting block of traditional republicans hold their nose to vote democrat vs. putting up with this kind of garbage out of our own party. Enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:51 AM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,411,323 times
Reputation: 6388
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrlFlaUsa View Post
It's interesting that the side that wildly accuses people of being socialists for attempting to correct inequities is arguing that it's unfair that teachers get benefits, have unions, or whatnot. Hmm, sounds like the other side is now guilty of using the socialist, equality, and let's level the playing field talking points. Hey, why not go argue your case to the boss or CEO of your company. Tell him/her that you want better pay and more benefits and see how much they do for you. After all government isn't the answer right, then go change things in the private sector and right this wrong!!
Let me have a whack at your ramble.

1. Nobody ever said public employees should not have benefits. It just does not seem right that they have 74 cents in benefits per dollar of compensation, TRIPLE the average of the private sector employees who pay the taxes that provide the benefits.

2. The solution is not to raise private sector benefits to unsustainable levels. I am the CEO (I also take out the trash) so I know full well that the cost of benefits comes out of the finite pool of value generated by employees, based on their usefulness to the company (and indirectly, to the rest of society.) Unlike public sector employees, for me, "benefits" are not some money-tree by which I or my union can carve out value I did not earn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:53 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
That's just it. There are lots of fairly moderate republican union members out here (I live in the midwest) and they're TICKED OFF about this. We didn't vote for this kind of garbage.

You know the strategy being floated around with many of the moderate R's? Take back the party. Work hard for moderate candidates in the primary, and if a radical gets nominated--vote for the Democrat in the general. You want to see an uprising by the middle class? Watch a voting block of traditional republicans hold their nose to vote democrat vs. putting up with this kind of garbage out of our own party. Enough.


Ticked off, that union dues are not automatically paid?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Marietta, GA
7,887 posts, read 17,197,268 times
Reputation: 3706
At last, politicians who listen to the voters who elected them and keep their campaign promises. The voters of Wisconsin clearly understood what the Gov and the Republican legislators wanted to do if elected, and they voted for the Gov and the Republican majority based on their platform.

It's time for the Democrat cry baby, runaway cowards in the WI Senate to man up and come back and face the music. This whole "if I can't get my way...then I'll take my bat and ball and go to Illinois" is just crap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:58 AM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,330,758 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
I hope every teacher, fire fighter, police officer, sanatary worker, etc... goes on strike on Monday and shuts the state down. I KNOW none will ever vote for the sort of POS they have as Gov now, and a reminder, not all union workers are Dems, enjoy the show, the days of right-wing rule is ticking down quickly in Wis and the Nation.
Casper
The people of Wisc voted for him and the repubs knowing full well what he was going to do. He told them. The union told them.

If they didn't know then they are not smart enouh to be teachers, etc.

You may not be aware, the MSM won't report it, one of the issues he is addressing in collective bargainin is this example. The state runs several parks. The union under dem control agreed to allowing the park employees to work 7 to 3:30. No other shifts are authorized. If the park wanted to stay open past 3:30 as is very likely, overtime has to be paid.

I am not against paying overtime when the situation is needed but, why can't they have staggering shifts so people are on duty after 3;30? The union would not agree to any consesssion o this issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top