Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2011, 08:40 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,634,135 times
Reputation: 3870

Advertisements

Well, looks like someone is trying to sneak this through while the media is occupied with other matters...

Obama "IP czar" wants felony charges for illegal Web streaming

Quote:
The government wants to make sure that, as online piracy moves increasingly to streaming, the law keeps up with the activity... [The government's 'copyright czar' Victoria Espinel] wants Congress to "clarify that infringement by streaming, or by means of other similar new technology, is a felony in appropriate circumstances."
Not only that, but the paper calls for wiretaps to be used to identify people who may be "illegally streaming" media.

Here is the actual paper, in .pdf format:

Administration's White Paper On Intellectual Property Enforcement Legislative Recommendations

Under the broadest reading of this proposal, clicking on a Youtube video with an unauthorized audio track could make you a felon, since you would have streamed it without the permission of the copyright holder.

It's rather alarming in general how we have moved to the criminalization of copyright law - an area that used to be entirely the realm of civil courts.

Unfortunately, this is a bipartisan disaster - Victoria Espinel's "czar" position was created by the "Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO-IP) Act" of 2008 - signed into law by President George W. Bush in October of that year.

In fact, only 11 out of the 435 members of the US House voted against the PRO-IP Act - among them Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich.

I guess we'll see now if Speaker Boehner allows any of these proposals to make it into any House bills... he did vote for the PRO-IP Act, by the way...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2011, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Hey..they got the Patriot Act and can just use "National Security".
I'm sure there were some corporate lobbyists behind this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 08:44 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,850,642 times
Reputation: 9283
This is what happens when Big Government gets in bed with Big Business... the Americans subjugated to the rule of businesses... classic crony capitalism... Obama is no different... really sad...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 08:45 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 10,411,687 times
Reputation: 2881
This is shocking because.............?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 08:47 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,634,135 times
Reputation: 3870
It's shocking because of the scope of conduct it would potentially turn into federal felonies, and the potential to expand the "security state" into the private lives (and computers) of millions of citizens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 08:51 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,040,586 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
This is what happens when Big Government gets in bed with Big Business... the Americans subjugated to the rule of businesses... classic crony capitalism... Obama is no different... really sad...
Big business? There are hundreds of small independent film makers and thousands of workers who labor behind the scenes of major projects whose product is being stolen, yes stolen, by pirating their work.

Once again it is amazing how the so-called core values of so-called conservatives are based purely on what can be used to excoriate the current administration. For folks who claim that private property is sacrosanct to sudden turn a blind eye to what is no more than theft of intellectual property and to term protecting that intellectual property as just a power grab by the federal government is flat out astounding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 08:53 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,039,086 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post

Under the broadest reading of this proposal, clicking on a Youtube video with an unauthorized audio track could make you a felon, since you would have streamed it without the permission of the copyright holder...
"streaming a video" would refer to the site streaming it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 08:54 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,850,642 times
Reputation: 9283
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Big business? There are hundreds of small independent film makers and thousands of workers who labor behind the scenes of major projects whose product is being stolen, yes stolen, by pirating their work.

Once again it is amazing how the so-called core values of so-called conservatives are based purely on what can be used to excoriate the current administration. For folks who claim that private property is sacrosanct to sudden turn a blind eye to what is no more than theft of intellectual property and to term protecting that intellectual property as just a power grab by the federal government is flat out astounding.
Tell me what "core values" cause you keep talking about them but never explain what they are... stolen? Who stole it? Do they still have it? Did they profit off of it? Its amazing how someone would want to protect a DEFUNCT system of copyrights and patents that used to provide security for the development of technology is now a HINDRANCE to the development of technology... you can blah blah your corporatism all you want... the old system of slavery didn't work out, so now YOU decide that our masters should be corporations... thanks... no thanks...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
What happens if a kid is doing it at home and their parents don't know ?
Parents get charged with a felony ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 09:00 PM
 
3,681 posts, read 6,273,608 times
Reputation: 1516
Call me a dense old dinosaur, but what exactly is illegal streaming? How could a kid do it at home as someone pointed out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top