Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I wouldn't get into the impeaching stuff (it was silly talk under Bush, and it's silly now), but i'm most certainly angry as hell at the president. I'm still an Obama supporter, but if this Libya thing doesn't wrap up fast, i'm considering not voting for him in the next election.
I find your stance rather cynical.
You support him if Libya will "wrap up fast"?
If it is worth doing, is time that much of the essence? Or, if it was wrong in the first place, does its quick duration somehow make the wrong just a bit more palatable? Sounds like you are waiting to see if a decent outcome emerges before declaring Libya not such a bad idea. If Iraq had not seen a civil war and turned into an Arab version of Canada, would that have made invading it acceptable?
Sounds as if you are wetting your finger and holding it up to the wind.
I do agree the talk of impeachment is silly and I would consider the source.
I don't think you know what "carpetbombing" means.
ok..how about illegally bombing a sovernation
the facts remain:
obama bombed the sovern-nations of pakistan (jan09), somalia(sep09), yemen, and now lybia.....killing civilians
the real irony:
Obama: "We've got to get the job done there......... not just air-raiding(bombing) villages and killing civilians" (Philip Elliott, "Obama Gets Warning From Friendly Voter," The Associated Press, 8/14/07
btw
carpetbombing....an extensive and systematic bombing intended to devastate a large target
Last edited by workingclasshero; 03-22-2011 at 12:02 PM..
This thread is funny! The idea that the LW anti War Dem, Kucinich, blasts Obama on joining into the UN action, is not surprising. He is, after all, anti-war. The funny part, is the RW people who are aligning themselves with the LW Kucinich. I guess it's a case of "any anti-Obama port in a storm".
No...it is called principles...most leftists seem to have none.
If it is worth doing, is time that much of the essence? Or, if it was wrong in the first place, does its quick duration somehow make the wrong just a bit more palatable? Sounds like you are waiting to see if a decent outcome emerges before declaring Libya not such a bad idea. If Iraq had not seen a civil war and turned into an Arab version of Canada, would that have made invading it acceptable?
Sounds as if you are wetting your finger and holding it up to the wind.
I do agree the talk of impeachment is silly and I would consider the source.
Nothing that he does makes it palatable. It's not worth doing. And yea, time is of the essence because the longer we stay the worse it gets. And yes...it was wrong in the first place. And even if the outcome is decent, i still don't like the fact that we interfered.
And no..i NEVER hold up my finger to the wind on anything. Nothing. Nada. Donut. Zero.
No...it is called principles...most leftists seem to have none.
That is too funny. Great sarcasm!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
