Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:07 AM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,547,627 times
Reputation: 1951

Advertisements

Eat the Rich - Opinion - PatriotPost.US

Quote:
This year, Congress will spend $3.7 trillion dollars. That turns out to be about $10 billion per day. Can we prey upon the rich to cough up the money? According to IRS statistics, roughly 2 percent of U.S. households have an income of $250,000 and above. By the way, $250,000 per year hardly qualifies one as being rich. It's not even yacht and Learjet money. All told, households earning $250,000 and above account for 25 percent, or $1.97 trillion, of the nearly $8 trillion of total household income. If Congress imposed a 100 percent tax, taking all earnings above $250,000 per year, it would yield the princely sum of $1.4 trillion. That would keep the government running for 141 days, but there's a problem because there are 224 more days left in the year.
Not even a 100% tax will work. We have no choice but to exterminate some social programs or America is doomed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:09 AM
 
45,585 posts, read 27,203,264 times
Reputation: 23898
Unless Congress actively takes an interest in reducing the debt/deficit - shifting around tax money will be useless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,329,379 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
Eat the Rich - Opinion - PatriotPost.US

Not even a 100% tax will work. We have no choice but to cut some social programs or America is doomed.
I'm pleasantly surprised that you have not only come to this realization, but that you also created a post to debunk the liberal theories that if we only taxed the rich more, all our fiscal problems would be solved. Kudos!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:16 AM
 
2,112 posts, read 2,698,077 times
Reputation: 1774
Yeah, that would really provide motivation for the rich to earn money...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,311 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
Eat the Rich - Opinion - PatriotPost.US

Not even a 100% tax will work. We have no choice but to exterminate some social programs or America is doomed.

No it wouldn't balance the budget, but the top marginal rate should be increased, the bottom 50% needs to pay something and we need to cut spending.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:58 AM
 
Location: South Jordan, Utah
8,182 posts, read 9,215,899 times
Reputation: 3632
I did the same on the Million plus crowd.

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...-tax-rich.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:59 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,588,653 times
Reputation: 2823
It's doubtful that if it would bring in enough to balance the budget, which it wouldn't, that the additional money would be used to simply balance the budget. It would be spent and we would still have a deficit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,311 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Just because it won't balance the budget doens't mean the top marginal rate of 35% shouldn't be increased.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 01:44 PM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,547,627 times
Reputation: 1951
Quote:
Just because it won't balance the budget doens't mean the top marginal rate of 35% shouldn't be increased.
To what end?

And how much private wealth do you feel should be transferred to the Federal Bureaucracy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 01:55 PM
 
Location: South Jordan, Utah
8,182 posts, read 9,215,899 times
Reputation: 3632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Just because it won't balance the budget doens't mean the top marginal rate of 35% shouldn't be increased.
What will the unintended consequences of that action be?

How do we distinguish between the people who earn high income every year and those who have a onetime windfall that they could use to better their lives over the following years?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top