Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You're upset now about the money being used in the war you wanted him to start. Did you think it would be free? Be careful what you wish for....you just might get it.
Well, first of all he waited 30+ days to make a decision. Second, we have subsequently learned there was NOT mass slaughter or targeting of civilians, third, he made a half-hearted effort based on politics that basically assured the "allies" would fail.
Good catch. This is typical of how she operates. Attack Obama from whatever angle you can. In this case 1) Obama is a wimp for not helping...then later 2) Obama is being too aggressive. She very likely supports the use of the military to attack Arabs...but that's beside the point....The point is she can come up with an angle to attack Obama.
Another fraud she will pull is attack Democrats for not going along with assaults on civil liberties like the Patriot Act...but now that Obama is in power..she's all about Libertarian ideals pointing out his flaws in this area.
It's a shame the archives only go back to 2007....I could show you things that would make your head spin....lol
I've learned to pay NO attention to her posts......generally they are meant to be argumentative and inflammatory without any logical and coherent perspective.
Good catch. This is typical of how she operates. Attack Obama from whatever angle you can. In this case 1) Obama is a wimp for not helping...then later 2) Obama is being too aggressive. She very likely supports the use of the military to attack Arabs...but that's beside the point....The point is she can come up with an angle to attack Obama.
Another fraud she will pull is attack Democrats for not going along with assaults on civil liberties like the Patriot Act...but now that Obama is in power..she's all about Libertarian ideals pointing out his flaws in this area.
It's a shame the archives only go back to 2007....I could show you things that would make your head spin....lol
Already answered this; Obama waited 30+ days to make a decision, by then, it was OVER, the rebels were on the run, cornered in their last remaining stronghold. He then decided for some strikes and proceeded to turn the whole lot over to NATO, where the bombing and NFZ has been botched from the beginning. Other NATO members are reticent to ramp up the bombing, are resisting putting troops/advisors on the ground and WON'T do the fighting for the rebels, which is the only way they can win.
Then we find out AFTER we already committed resources, there was NO slaughtering of civilians (shouldn't obama have known about that BEFORE), then we find out that elements of AQ are within the rebel ranks (shouldn't obama have known about that BEFORE), where he proceeds to give them millions of dollars in supplies and more in predator drones.
He has botched it from the very beginning when he decided he would engage...but not all the way, when he decided he would turn the leadership role over to France.
There IS a reason liberals have been traditionally distrusted in military matters.
Officials in and out of the WH, Pentagon have said what a mess this "mission" is. So have the pundits and FP experts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
