Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I realize everyone is all giddy about Trump pulling out of the deeply flawed Paris Accords, but there still are potential brewing scandals involving former Obama officials.
Here are some very juicy tidbits from the conservative blog Hot Air -
"Thanks to Devin Nunes, chairman of the House Intel Committee and the man who first raised suspicions about improper “unmasking” in March, subpoenas have been issued to three Obama-era officials. Two are natsec people — Susan Rice and John Brennan, both of whom might have had good cause to “unmask” the identities of Trump staffers in the course of reviewing intelligence reports. But the third was a surprise. It’s Samantha Power, formerly the U.S. ambassador to the UN. Why would she be caught up in an “unmasking” review? She’s a diplomat, not an intelligence specialist."
I realize everyone is all giddy about Trump pulling out of the deeply flawed Paris Accords, but there still are potential brewing scandals involving former Obama officials.
Here are some very juicy tidbits from the conservative blog Hot Air -
"Thanks to Devin Nunes, chairman of the House Intel Committee and the man who first raised suspicions about improper “unmasking” in March, subpoenas have been issued to three Obama-era officials. Two are natsec people — Susan Rice and John Brennan, both of whom might have had good cause to “unmask” the identities of Trump staffers in the course of reviewing intelligence reports. But the third was a surprise. It’s Samantha Power, formerly the U.S. ambassador to the UN. Why would she be caught up in an “unmasking” review? She’s a diplomat, not an intelligence specialist."
This is a quick, fun read with lots of interesting links...especially if you're sick and tired of reading about the Paris Accords
Who said she unmasked anyone other than you and Hotair. The fact that Nunes subpoenaed her should make any normal person question his motives but you even took the next leap.
I realize everyone is all giddy about Trump pulling out of the deeply flawed Paris Accords, but there still are potential brewing scandals involving former Obama officials.
Here are some very juicy tidbits from the conservative blog Hot Air -
"Thanks to Devin Nunes, chairman of the House Intel Committee and the man who first raised suspicions about improper “unmasking” in March, subpoenas have been issued to three Obama-era officials. Two are natsec people — Susan Rice and John Brennan, both of whom might have had good cause to “unmask” the identities of Trump staffers in the course of reviewing intelligence reports. But the third was a surprise. It’s Samantha Power, formerly the U.S. ambassador to the UN. Why would she be caught up in an “unmasking” review? She’s a diplomat, not an intelligence specialist."
Who said she unmasked anyone other than you and Hotair. The fact that Nunes subpoenaed her should make any normal person question his motives but you even took the next leap.
The next leap!
Remember Adam Schiff of California, the panel's senior Democrat? Possibly Nunes biggest critic? Here's what he had to say about the subpoenas - "The committee rules provide that the chair (Nunes) has to sign the subpoenas unless that authority is delegated to someone else," Schiff said on MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Reports. "That authority should have been delegated to Mike Conaway in consultation with myself. That hasn't happened yet. And I think that's a violation of the recusal by the chairman ... I hope that will change."
That's it? Schiff has been one of Nunes harshest critics. That has to be one of the most tepid complaints from Schiff I've ever seen, but then Schiff has been a bit subdued since seeing Devin Nunes’ evidence for Obama surveillance.
Who said she unmasked anyone other than you and Hotair. The fact that Nunes subpoenaed her should make any normal person question his motives but you even took the next leap.
Are you suggesting that they pulled her name out of a hat, and subpoenaed her?
Remember Adam Schiff of California, the panel's senior Democrat? Possibly Nunes biggest critic? Here's what he had to say about the subpoenas - "The committee rules provide that the chair (Nunes) has to sign the subpoenas unless that authority is delegated to someone else," Schiff said on MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Reports. "That authority should have been delegated to Mike Conaway in consultation with myself. That hasn't happened yet. And I think that's a violation of the recusal by the chairman ... I hope that will change."
That's it? Schiff has been one of Nunes harshest critics. That has to be one of the most tepid complaints from Schiff I've ever seen, but then Schiff has been a bit subdued since seeing Devin Nunes’ evidence for Obama surveillance.
Nunes shouldn't be involved in anything related to the investigation, he has already proved that he is incapable.
Well if this was Nunes suggestion then it is more about politics than arriving at the truth. By the way this is June, where has he been.
Wait, I think you mean Rep. Schiff.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
