Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Who counted pixels? All you have to do is draw a line under a word to see if it is 180 degrees or if it is slanting to the left. The program will give you the exact slant in degrees.
And that's your problem. If you draw a line, all you will see is the line. Not what the word is actually doing. This is especially true because a curve is not a line. It is a curve.
Go count pixels. You will see that the words all curve just as they should.
Certainly, you can see the faint text that is the complete background of the document right? Get some imaging software and adjust the contrast if you want to see it better.
The full background text reads:
Rough translation:
"This is not a valid government document. This is political commentary. He is President for at least three and a half more years. Get used to it, it's not going to change."
Oh, in the background, okay I accept what you say. Brian you are not helping!!!
Yes, that is the order ... however ... there would be a strong case for removing Biden ... since this isn't just impeachment of Obama ... this is a matter of ineligibility, and criminal fraud ... rendering Obama's presidency null & void ... which would render Joey Boy null & void too, since he ran on a fraudulent ticket, with a criminal running mate.
One might even make the case that McCain might be retroactively appointed President, since he lost to Obama in a fraudulent election.
Yes, that is the order ... however ... there would be a strong case for removing Biden ... since this isn't just impeachment of Obama ... this is a matter of ineligibility, and criminal fraud ... rendering Obama's presidency null & void ... which would render Joey Boy null & void too, since he ran on a fraudulent ticket, with a criminal running mate.
One might even make the case that McCain might be retroactively appointed President, since he lost to Obama in a fraudulent election.
Now honestly - answer my question! - do you really think that is going to happen?
Fair enough, I haven't asked these questions of you directly, but posted these questions about a dozen times in the previous birther megathread, in which you had several posts. In any event, those threads did move fast, but they seem like basic questions that you should be able to answer.
Conspiracy theories constantly require that we believe the fantastic and discount the mundane. Here we have people posting about "smiley faces" and kerning, and the most coherent possible narrative by which Obama could be born in Kenya seems to involve a very pregnant teenager leaving her friends and family to travel thousands of miles to a third world country, without telling anybody, and her family for some reason committing an elaborate fraud to get his birth registered in Hawaii anyway, when it's likely he would have been a citizen from birth, or at the least easily naturalized.
On the other hand, all the relevant officials, from both parties, have vouched for Obama's birth certificate's authenticity on many occasions. So if you're going to ask us to discount the mundane and believe the fantastic, it would be nice to know what exactly your fantastic theory is.
No ... you've got it backwards, pal. You have a guy doing everything he can do to keep secret his history ... from school records to birth certificate. You've got a guy who claims to have been born in Hawaii, yet his Social Security number is tied to Connecticut? And for months, the claim was that the first form ... the short form was the ONLY form available ... that a long form didn't exist. Magically, one shows up ... and you really have to be willfully ignorant in order to accept this clear forgery as anything close to legitimate. It's a joke .... and the joke is on you for believing that hogwash coming from a President and an administration that has proven itself to be psychopathic liars.
We've heard the ridiculous to the absurd .... that Hawaii doesn't release long forms anymore ... and not even for the President of the United States ... that's fantastic. Then all of a sudden one appears, and in layers, where you can see the areas of forgery ... but the claim is ... that was just the way it was scanned ... and Adobe Illustrator automatically created those layers ...WRONG ... Illustrator may indeed create layers from a flat file, but only one layer will have the data, while the other layers are blank.
Then we have testimony from family claiming he was born in Kenya .... we have Kenyan officials claiming he was born in Kenya ... we have signs in Kenya saying birthplace of the President of the United States ... we have Obama's freaking wife saying he was born in Kenya .... apparently, everyone in the freaking world knows this clown was born in Kenya except the nitwits born in the USA.
The only thing "fantastic" here is how freaking utterly ridiculous it is for Americans to defend this fraud and usurper.
not under the de facto officer doctrine. all decisions made by obama would remain intact, nothing would become "null and void".
You are 100 percent freaking wrong. If Obama is ineligible, he was never legitimately the President, and his signature has no force or power ... there is no such thing as "de facto" FRAUD.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obama's birth certificate is a fake
