Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Okay, I suck at conveying a message, one person got it.
They may have gotten the premise, but the premise is still wrong.
Just two example, American Indians didn't discriminate against white women captured for the purpose of providing women to produce more children, and many a white slave owner didn't let their racism keep them from procreating with their slaves.
Your belief that "like breeds with like" is illogical, based on nothing but racism and is completely irrelevant.
Umm... no. Did you not read the two main thoughts that drive evolution?
Quote:
Generally, there are two schools of thought about what affects evolution," said Andrew P. Allen, Ph.D., a researcher with the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis in Santa Barbara, Calif. "One says the environment dictates changes that occur in the genome and phenotype of a species, and the other says the DNA mutation rate drives these changes. Our findings suggest physiological processes that drive mutation rates are important."
They may have gotten the premise, but the premise is still wrong.
Just two example, American Indians didn't discriminate against white women captured for the purpose of providing women to produce more children, and many a white slave owner didn't let their racism keep them from procreating with their slaves.
But that's still the same species. Maybe the question would have just been best if it didn't have breeds at all. It does sound offensive.
Quote:
: a group of usually domesticated animals or plants presumably related by descent from common ancestors and visibly similar in most characters
2 : a number of persons of the same stock
I don't think it's in our genes. I think it's our environment and how we see and hear others relate to people. But I do think we will eventually evolve without voice boxes since texting and other forms of communications are taking over without actually speaking to each other. lol Sorry
I don't think it's in our genes. I think it's our environment and how we see and hear others relate to people. But I do think we will eventually evolve without voice boxes since texting and other forms of communications are taking over without actually speaking to each other. lol Sorry
Let's move forward as one planet.
To do that we head off to space. Will we be weary of the first species (aliens?) we come across? (Is that okay? Can I use these words? I'm not offending the PC crowd am I?)
Umm... no. Did you not read the two main thoughts that drive evolution?
Nothing about interbreeding...
Sorry if truth offends.
Interbreeding.
Define that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
