Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-17-2011, 08:21 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,646,722 times
Reputation: 3870

Advertisements

Automation and increased efficiency are naturally expected to eliminate an increasing number of jobs over time.

The traditional argument that this naturally creates "new jobs" is decreasingly valid over time, since we are running out of other tasks to which large quantities of human labor need to be applied.

It will be an interesting social issue in our near future, even moreso than it is today.

You have to distinguish between "redistributive" increases in efficiency (eg, a machine frees up laborers to do some other labor that had previously been squeezed by lack of manpower or development - hence, it shuffles the labor around, but doesn't decrease the overall quantity of labor needed) and "replacement" increases in efficiency, where human labor as a whole is devalued, not replaced, and is made redundant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-17-2011, 08:38 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,499,977 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Series Id: CES3000000001
Seasonally Adjusted
Super Sector: Manufacturing
Industry: Manufacturing
NAICS Code: -
Data Type: ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS

1939 Jan - 9077
1979 Jun - 19553 (peak)
2011 May - 11694(P)
Top Picks (Most Requested Statistics) : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Something here isn't jiving with top tax rates a mfg. employment.

Last edited by BigJon3475; 06-17-2011 at 09:37 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2011, 09:33 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,380,428 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
Well it's not entirely bogus. Automation has been eliminating jobs forever.
True, as shown by Obamas choice of picking a nearly 40 year old technology in his example. I wonder how many potential bank workers today weren't even born when ATMs were first installed?

Technology eliminates jobs but it also creates new ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2011, 09:53 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,646,722 times
Reputation: 3870
Quote:
it also creates new ones.
That's the hope. But there is no actual economic "law" which dictates that this must be true. It's entirely possible for technology and automation to eliminate more jobs over time than it "creates."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top