Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you prefer a congressman who compromises or sticks to their guns no matter what?
Compromises to get things done 27 51.92%
Sticks to their principles no matter what 25 48.08%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-13-2011, 04:56 AM
 
Location: St. Joseph Area
6,233 posts, read 9,481,332 times
Reputation: 3133

Advertisements

...compromises to get things done, or sticks to his principles no matter what?

Personally, I'd rather have a congressman who's willing to compromise to get things done. I simply don't see compromise as a dirty word. Be willing to bend, so that you don't break, and all that. So what do you all think? And explain your reasoning if you care to.

mackinac
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2011, 05:29 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,366,055 times
Reputation: 2922
I could not vote in the poll and my position is it is acceptable to compromise if you are getting something in return. The last big battle is a good example, the {R}s received the Bush Tax cut extension and some budget cuts. In return the {R}s agreed to the UE extension, this is a good horse trade. Very rarely do I want my rep to compromise but if he is part of a horse trade I am not going to verbally beat him up for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 05:33 AM
 
Location: St. Joseph Area
6,233 posts, read 9,481,332 times
Reputation: 3133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swingblade View Post
I could not vote in the poll and my position is it is acceptable to compromise if you are getting something in return. The last big battle is a good example, the {R}s received the Bush Tax cut extension and some budget cuts. In return the {R}s agreed to the UE extension, this is a good horse trade. Very rarely do I want my rep to compromise but if he is part of a horse trade I am not going to verbally beat him up for it.
So basically you're for compromise but against selling out, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 05:51 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,366,055 times
Reputation: 2922
Quote:
Originally Posted by mackinac81 View Post
So basically you're for compromise but against selling out, right?
Yes, but as stated if there is compromise I want my rep to make sure he is getting some favorable legislation in return.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,282,893 times
Reputation: 3826
Compromise got us 14T. No more compromise. Not being able to raise the debt limit is the TRUE way to starve the beast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 06:06 AM
 
Location: St. Joseph Area
6,233 posts, read 9,481,332 times
Reputation: 3133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swingblade View Post
Yes, but as stated if there is compromise I want my rep to make sure he is getting some favorable legislation in return.
That's understandable. That's what I had in mind when I was asking the question--a horse trade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 06:10 AM
 
1,168 posts, read 1,244,629 times
Reputation: 912
The two are not mutually exclusive. You can compromise so things move into the direction of your principles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,938,118 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Compromise got us 14T. No more compromise. Not being able to raise the debt limit is the TRUE way to starve the beast.
Let us know how that works out when the government defaults.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 06:42 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,282,893 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Let us know how that works out when the government defaults.
Casper
Won't happen even if debt ceiling isn't raised. Thanks for playing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 06:45 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Sticking to your principles is less important than compromising to get things done?

No wonder this world and this nation is up **** creek with voters who actually do not care for principles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top