Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Marion, IA
2,793 posts, read 6,125,245 times
Reputation: 1613

Advertisements

Or is that his excuse for not allowing spending cuts? Seems like this whole debt crisis would be over if we had a new president who was able to control spending. You really have to wonder why, by his own admission, he does something that could single handedly take down his presidency.

What is this guy hiding? What is his obsession with taxing the rich? The rich and corporations already pay the most income taxes by far than any other group and there isn't nearly enough money to make a dent in the defecit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:22 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,776,811 times
Reputation: 6856
So we need to do drastic cuts that would hurt the elderly and poor, so Bill Gates can get more tax breaks? That makes sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:22 PM
 
608 posts, read 1,347,074 times
Reputation: 469
They only pay the most because they are the only ones with any money left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:23 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,863,777 times
Reputation: 1517
It's marketing. Tax the rich is a message that appeals to the masses. That's it. He knows damn well it will not dent the deficit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Marion, IA
2,793 posts, read 6,125,245 times
Reputation: 1613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
So we need to do drastic cuts that would hurt the elderly and poor, so Bill Gates can get more tax breaks? That makes sense.
I'm sorry but that makes no sense. The elderly and the poor have not gone away since Obama was elected, yet he has increased government spending by 3 times what it was at any time during the Bush years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:29 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,776,811 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by zz4guy View Post
I'm sorry but that makes no sense. The elderly and the poor have not gone away since Obama was elected, yet he has increased government spending by 3 times what it was at any time during the Bush years.
The GOP is pushing for cuts to SS/Medicare/Medicaid and defending tax breaks for billionaires. It doesn't make sense, but that's what they are trying to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:31 PM
 
1,457 posts, read 2,028,774 times
Reputation: 1407
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
It's marketing. Tax the rich is a message that appeals to the masses. That's it. He knows damn well it will not dent the deficit.
This

Tax them 100% and it will be like spitting in the ocean.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:32 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,984,135 times
Reputation: 4555
To get an idea what the OP is whining about when he talks about "Obama's obsession" with raising taxes on the rich.

This last little bar on the far right is what they are crying about.

http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/wp.../top_rates.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,766,994 times
Reputation: 5691
Quote:
Originally Posted by zz4guy View Post
I'm sorry but that makes no sense. The elderly and the poor have not gone away since Obama was elected, yet he has increased government spending by 3 times what it was at any time during the Bush years.
Don't be a moron. What has the expenditure been other than to bail out the financial sector, which crashed and burned after a decade of deregulation? There is no way that Obama increased domestic and military spending 3x. The point is, Bush's tax rates were unsustainably low and expenditures ridiculously high throughout the housing boom, and noone raised an eyebrow. When the fool's gold ran dry, everyone is suddenly a fiscal conservative.

The tax rates during Clinton's era seemed to work. The Bush era was a pipe dream. We need to return to reality. Get over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:34 PM
 
Location: SELA
532 posts, read 1,056,221 times
Reputation: 229
It's an application of a rational economic principle, the law of diminishing marginal utility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top