Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:20 AM
 
147 posts, read 371,372 times
Reputation: 105

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
Talk with your President.
What country are you from? Who's your Prime Minister?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:21 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,707,101 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninintothevoid View Post
What country are you from? Who's your Prime Minister?

Sorry I am not claiming him. He may be the President of the moment but I disowned him a long time ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:26 AM
 
147 posts, read 371,372 times
Reputation: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
Sorry I am not claiming him. He may be the President of the moment but I disowned him a long time ago.
Probably January 20th, 2009, just a guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:27 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,707,101 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninintothevoid View Post
Probably January 20th, 2009, just a guess.

Quick you are young Jedi. Yes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:28 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
This sits in Reid's lap now.

The bill is there to settle this, but he has it tabled.

So what Obama says he will veto it. Then it is on him.


The house has done their job. Now it is up to the Senate to hound Harry Reid to bring it off the table and put it to a vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:31 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,707,101 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
This sits in Reid's lap now.

The bill is there to settle this, but he has it tabled.

So what Obama says he will veto it. Then it is on him.


The house has done their job. Now it is up to the Senate to hound Harry Reid to bring it off the table and put it to a vote.
Exactly. The adults in the room have spoken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
Exactly. The adults in the room have spoken.
Noise doesn't guarantee sanity, much less logic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninintothevoid View Post
What country are you from? Who's your Prime Minister?
It doesn't really matter. There's nothing wrong with "cut, cap & balance" except that there is a price to pay and that price is recession.

If you're willing to pay the price and suffer the consequences then go ahead.

Of course, if you don't "cut, cap & balance" there is a prices to pay as well, and that price is recession too.

I guess the difference is making a choice or having the choice forced upon you (which really isn't a choice).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:35 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,464,007 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post

The upper percentil, as you put it, tends to hold higher positions of power, of responsibity, of education, and of investment. Those who have put their money to work for them while they work (as opposed to only working for their money) will indeed raise their wealth/standard of living faster than those who do not tend to put their money to work (if they have invested wisely and not spent more than they earn). So, it is not all about wages/earnings but also about savings/investment vs. spending.

If those who work would turn about and invest in those companies for whom they work they'd have more say on executive compensation. On a smaller scale, those companies which allow direct employee investment (employee owned) tend to have a higher rate of worker satisfaction than those who do not. Rather than trying to bust the corporation these employees have a real stake in the company being a success (as part owners).

So, you can keep playing the class warfare card or you can change the way in which you view the creation of wealth as coming from public collectivism/redistributive wealth rather than individual investment.

HowTF are people working for $8 per hour going to invest in "these companies" or even to stop being rent slaves?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
It doesn't really matter. There's nothing wrong with "cut, cap & balance" except that there is a price to pay and that price is recession.

If you're willing to pay the price and suffer the consequences then go ahead.

Of course, if you don't "cut, cap & balance" there is a prices to pay as well, and that price is recession too.

I guess the difference is making a choice or having the choice forced upon you (which really isn't a choice).
I wonder if 18 debt ceiling increase during Reagan era, and seven during Bush, contributed to five-ish recessions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top