Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,068 posts, read 10,134,583 times
Reputation: 1651

Advertisements

"Accidents are 36.6 percent more severe even when alcohol was barely detectable in a driver's blood," Phillips said. Even with a BAC of 0.01, Phillips and Brewer write, there are 4.33 serious injuries for every non-serious injury versus 3.17 for sober drivers.



There are at least three mechanisms that help to explain this finding, Phillips said: "Compared with sober drivers, buzzed drivers are more likely to speed, more likely to be improperly seat-belted and more likely to drive the striking vehicle, all of which are associated with greater severity."



There also seems to be a strong "dose-response" relationship between all these factors, the authors write: The greater the blood-alcohol content, the greater the average speed of the driver and the greater the severity of the accident, for example.


The findings persist even when such potentially confounding variables as inattention and fatigue are excluded from the analysis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,862,986 times
Reputation: 2881
American statistics for 2009 say that 32% of road accidents involved alcohol-impaired drivers.

Which means that 68% of road accidents were caused by sober drivers.

Does that mean that 'statistically', you are less likely to be involved in an accident if you are drunk??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:27 AM
 
Location: lake zurich, il
3,197 posts, read 2,853,909 times
Reputation: 1217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
American statistics for 2009 say that 32% of road accidents involved alcohol-impaired drivers.

Which means that 68% of road accidents were caused by sober drivers.

Does that mean that 'statistically', you are less likely to be involved in an accident if you are drunk??
No unless there are as many drunk drivers on the road as there are sober drivers.

Last edited by JohKnip; 06-20-2011 at 08:50 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:38 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,150,886 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
American statistics for 2009 say that 32% of road accidents involved alcohol-impaired drivers.

Which means that 68% of road accidents were caused by sober drivers.

Does that mean that 'statistically', you are less likely to be involved in an accident if you are drunk??
You failed at statistics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:40 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,150,886 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohKnip View Post
No unless there are as many drunk drivers on the road as there are sober drivers.
bingo!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,862,986 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
You failed at statistics.
Well it was supposed to be 'tongue-in-cheek'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:58 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
American statistics for 2009 say that 32% of road accidents involved alcohol-impaired drivers.

Which means that 68% of road accidents were caused by sober drivers.

Does that mean that 'statistically', you are less likely to be involved in an accident if you are drunk??

Yes.

And that first number is misleading. For example, if you drink a beer and are sitting at a red light and somebody rear ends you, that is an "alcohol related accident".

MADD has totally brainwashed the public into thinking this problem is much worse than it really is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
You failed at statistics.

Yes, and so did the OP.

Correlation does not mean causation.

The OP is total bunk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 09:09 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,875,929 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Yes.

And that first number is misleading. For example, if you drink a beer and are sitting at a red light and somebody rear ends you, that is an "alcohol related accident".

MADD has totally brainwashed the public into thinking this problem is much worse than it really is.
Well of course,MADD needs the donations to keep rolling in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,068 posts, read 10,134,583 times
Reputation: 1651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
American statistics for 2009 say that 32% of road accidents involved alcohol-impaired drivers.

Which means that 68% of road accidents were caused by sober drivers.

Does that mean that 'statistically', you are less likely to be involved in an accident if you are drunk??
Suppose for a second that drunk drivers are hitting sober drivers. Does that help a bit?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top