Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-15-2009, 07:51 PM
 
Location: Northern California
481 posts, read 806,972 times
Reputation: 245

Advertisements

I started studying the subject online and the twin towers DO look exactly like controlled demolition!

I also looked at the original hole in the Pentagon and it was no bigger than a garage door. And where the plane engines and tail should have hit the building, the windows are not even cracked.

Now I don't know what to think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-15-2009, 07:53 PM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,160,558 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apples&Oranges View Post
I started studying the subject online and the twin towers DO look exactly like controlled demolition!

I also looked at the original hole in the Pentagon and it was no bigger than a garage door. And where the plane engines and tail should have hit the building, the windows are not even cracked.

Now I don't know what to think.
A good friend told me that 9/11/2001 was an inside job. Can that be true?


Yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,966,939 times
Reputation: 7118
You bet it was.

Evil Bush and Cheney set the whole thing up. They rigged the towers with C4 and blew the whole shebang after those planes on autopilot with no passengers flew into the buildings.

The even got UBL and his bunch to confess to the crime.

The hole in PA was really a truck bomb as well as the bomb that took out the side of the Pentagon.

The tape that shows the plane slamming into the building is photoshopped and the hundreds of witnesses that actually saw the plane flying low towards the pentagon are bush insiders, even the ones driving on the freeway and mowing their lawns. The media was directed to those particular people to keep the story straight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 08:02 PM
 
Location: Northern California
481 posts, read 806,972 times
Reputation: 245
Wow. I'm going to do some more research. I always wondered why Bush just sat there in the classroom doing absolutely nothing. And even more suspicious, his secret service didn't immediately whisk him to safety, because his location had been published in the paper. He was a likely next target. His behavior didn't make sense to me at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 08:02 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,195 posts, read 19,232,404 times
Reputation: 14919
And the really neat part is, Saddam Hussein himself was flying not one but BOTH of the planes that hit the Towers. That's why they didn't hit at the same time.

That's what Uncle Dick said, anyhow.

And he should know, if anyone does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 08:09 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,138,171 times
Reputation: 9409
You need new friends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
15,154 posts, read 11,632,034 times
Reputation: 8625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apples&Oranges View Post
Wow. I'm going to do some more research. I always wondered why Bush just sat there in the classroom doing absolutely nothing. And even more suspicious, his secret service didn't immediately whisk him to safety, because his location had been published in the paper. He was a likely next target. His behavior didn't make sense to me at all.
And I'm sure your "Friend" knew immediatly after the first plane hit the WTC that it was a terrorist attack, and not a plane malfunction or pilot error huh? The secret service agent said "mr president, a plane hit the North Tower of the WTC." Bush was supposed to automatically conclude it was a terrorist attack? Give me a break
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Marietta, GA
7,887 posts, read 17,200,284 times
Reputation: 3706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apples&Oranges View Post
I started studying the subject online and the twin towers DO look exactly like controlled demolition!

I also looked at the original hole in the Pentagon and it was no bigger than a garage door. And where the plane engines and tail should have hit the building, the windows are not even cracked.

Now I don't know what to think.
OMG....can people be this stupid and naive? I wish I could say no. Sad commentary on our society. I wonder if there were equally stupid people in 1941 who asked if Pearl Harbor was an inside job?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 08:14 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,330,973 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
You bet it was.

Evil Bush and Cheney set the whole thing up. They rigged the towers with C4 and blew the whole shebang after those planes on autopilot with no passengers flew into the buildings.

The even got UBL and his bunch to confess to the crime.

The hole in PA was really a truck bomb as well as the bomb that took out the side of the Pentagon.

The tape that shows the plane slamming into the building is photoshopped and the hundreds of witnesses that actually saw the plane flying low towards the pentagon are bush insiders, even the ones driving on the freeway and mowing their lawns. The media was directed to those particular people to keep the story straight.
Liar!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 08:14 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,070,009 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apples&Oranges View Post
I started studying the subject online and the twin towers DO look exactly like controlled demolition!

I also looked at the original hole in the Pentagon and it was no bigger than a garage door. And where the plane engines and tail should have hit the building, the windows are not even cracked.

Now I don't know what to think.
I think that you should get a new friend, or at least one with an ounce of sense.

No the twin towers don't look like a controlled demolition and how large of a cylinder to you think a jet fuselage is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top