Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What I find interesting is the bizarro alternative world in which you appear to exist. When Kerry's and Gore's transcripts were leaked the media showed just as much interest in them as they have shown Perry's.
Are you crazy? The revelation of his plagiarism was front page news in the New York Times.
Got any proof of that Magna *** Laude? I thought his school records were private? I'll standy while you provide proof from Harvard of this.
It's PUBLIC RECORD.
Just go to Harvard's website and bring up the graduates from the Law School for 1991. Obama's name will be on that list, and next to it will be a little notation "mcl". That indicates he graduated with high honors. I would do that for you, but given your conspiracy theories, I think it's better you do it yourself.
The grades were given to him because he is Black/white....
of course he won't release his grades. If his gradres were decent, he would release them.. He is a phone and totally corrupt. Good thing he is goiung to get his butt whipped big time next November..
Just go to Harvard's website and bring up the graduates from the Law School for 1991. Obama's name will be on that list, and next to it will be a little notation "mcl". That indicates he graduated with high honors. I would do that for you, but given your conspiracy theories, I think it's better you do it yourself.
What conspiracy theories? I have spouted none. All I have asserted is that Obama perpetuates a shroud of secrecy and I posted proof of that. And all we get from you is that it was a "mistake." I find that to be quite a stretch coming from a President who could have easily dispelled rumors of his secret life from Day 1, and did not.
The grades were given to him because he is Black/white....
of course he won't release his grades. If his gradres were decent, he would release them.. He is a phone and totally corrupt. Good thing he is goiung to get his butt whipped big time next November..
If his grades were not decent, then he would not have merited the Magna C Laude designation. Magna C Laude references the top 20% of the class at Harvard. That means he performed better than 80% of the rest of the class.
What conspiracy theories? I have spouted none. All I have asserted is that Obama perpetuates a shroud of secrecy and I posted proof of that. And all we get from you is that it was a "mistake." I find that to be quite a stretch coming from a President who could have easily dispelled rumors of his secret life from Day 1, and did not.
You did not post proof of any shroud of secrecy. And a "shroud of secrecy" could easily be used as a definition of a conspiracy. Your reference to a "secret life" isn't helping to dispel the impression that you believe in conspiracies.
Let's recap--Obama graduated from Harvard Law School, one of the most rigorous institutions of higher learning in the world. He graduated in the top 20% of his class, with honors. This is a matter of public record. His personal and private records are NOT public records, and there is nothing by law or even by tradition that compels Presidents or candidates for President to make private records public.
You did not post proof of any shroud of secrecy. And a "shroud of secrecy" could easily be used as a definition of a conspiracy. Your reference to a "secret life" isn't helping to dispel the impression that you believe in conspiracies.
Let's recap--Obama graduated from Harvard Law School, one of the most rigorous institutions of higher learning in the world. He graduated in the top 20% of his class, with honors. This is a matter of public record. His personal and private records are NOT public records, and there is nothing by law or even by tradition that compels Presidents or candidates for President to make private records public.
But yet you still maintain that it was a "mistake" that his campaign lied about his writings, and then backtracked when caught. How can a campaign citewhat his role was at the HLR (editing)....and not know that he did write? How is that possible? They would have had to converse with the candidate to know that he edited right? But nothing about writing was a part of the conversation?
Do you not see the cracks in your theory?
Mistake my ass. Complete and total fabrication until caught, thats what it is, and you know it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
