Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:16 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,065,647 times
Reputation: 3884

Advertisements

It was never clear if the vouchers would have been adequate, or inadequate, since the projections of the voucher amounts were ten years in the future, when the program was scheduled to begin. Government projections, by neither Democratic nor Republicans is legendary for accuracy.

What is clear is the hue and cry by progressives that Ryan's plan was treacherous, when Obamacare had already diverted a half billion form Medicare to pay for the provisions of his act. Now, he adds another quarter billion to the tally. Both of these moves, btw, are intended to cut payments on the provider side. An increase in cost, whether from price increases and restriction of supply - Obamcare and now this proposal - , or whether by increasing patient cost - as alledged for the Ryan plan - is still an increase in cost.

It is simply the hypocrisy of the progressive stance, this spring and now, that is being debated here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Republicans are bi-polar. They want to end Medicare as we know it by converting it into a plan that offers vouchers that are insufficient to buy health insurance and then they deride Obama when he cuts some funds from Medicare. Make up your minds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-23-2011, 10:37 AM
 
8,630 posts, read 9,139,445 times
Reputation: 5990
Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007 View Post
ITA with this. There is no reason why we cannot just give up Medicare for middle class and wealthy seniors while allowing Medicaid to stay and put poor seniors on the Medicaid rolls.

Really though I am fine with Obama's plan. It also is very balanced IMO and it is very amusing to me that those on the right find cutting cost in Medicare as something that is horrible when many conservatives would like to get rid of the program as we know it now.
There are three issues with this. 1-the reason medicare exists in the first place is private for-profit health insurance companies did not want and refused to cover the elderly, fact not fiction. 2- the way things stand now those middle class retirees will not be middle class for long if they have to pay extremely high premiums per-month not to mention co-pays, deductibles and more than likely get axed from insurance altogether. 3-medicaid is one bad huge horrible HMO. So forget about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top