Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What do you think?
True 15 27.78%
False 39 72.22%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:22 AM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,264,386 times
Reputation: 1578

Advertisements

True or False?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:23 AM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,980,917 times
Reputation: 4332
Wouldnt that imply that every government worker was so productive and efficient that they did the job of two private sector workers? I cant buy that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:26 AM
 
Location: in a cabin overlooking the mountains
3,078 posts, read 4,376,792 times
Reputation: 2276
Actually I assume that government workers are not more productive and efficient but cost more than private sector workers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,861,032 times
Reputation: 4585
Pretty sure that's how China manages to compete so well in the Labor costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,827,269 times
Reputation: 12341
Well, couple of days ago a couple of "conservatives" were claiming that the USA saw full employment under Bush, at the same time that government jobs grew at unprecedented levels. So, clearly, with that "reality" in mind, the "conservative" answer must be "False". And yet this liberal/progressive has it "False" as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:30 AM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,980,917 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrugalYankee View Post
Actually I assume that government workers are not more productive and efficient but cost more than private sector workers.
I see, but saving $ on government workers would not be a direct 100% transfer of those savings to the private sector. Also, the private sector is having a hard time finding the skill sets they need to hire...not that I'm against trying to reduce the number of government employees though. Just kinda thinking through it out loud.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:41 AM
 
954 posts, read 1,281,334 times
Reputation: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrugalYankee View Post
Actually I assume that government workers are not more productive and efficient but cost more than private sector workers.
If we've learned anything, it's that the truism that when profits go up companies hire more people is false - likewise, cutting taxes won't cause companies to hire more people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Pretty sure that's how China manages to compete so well in the Labor costs.
I think paying their workers slave wages with no benefits is how they keep labor costs so low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:42 AM
 
20,462 posts, read 12,387,859 times
Reputation: 10259
firing goverment workers might not create jobs but i am willing to bet if no democrat or liberal voted for the next 10 years, America would create more than 50 million jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:53 AM
 
Location: in a cabin overlooking the mountains
3,078 posts, read 4,376,792 times
Reputation: 2276
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
I see, but saving $ on government workers would not be a direct 100% transfer of those savings to the private sector. Also, the private sector is having a hard time finding the skill sets they need to hire...not that I'm against trying to reduce the number of government employees though. Just kinda thinking through it out loud.
Nothing wrong with thinking it through out loud.

Now that I'm doing the same thing myself something else occurred to me. We could get rid of a lot of state level bureacrats where I have my small business and I guarantee you that there would be more jobs. They are only there to harass small businesses - get rid of them and we would be more inclined to stay in-state and also hire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 12:27 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,208,847 times
Reputation: 5481
Are we using the tax salaries previously taken up by those people to deregulate?

What did those government employees do? Were they soldiers or DMV workers?

How long are you giving us to create the new jobs?

What an inane question....How on earth can we answer this with any semblance of intelligence?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top