Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This can happen if we get new people as Secretaries of Energy, Interior, and a couple of others. Well, we do have to get a new President to accomplish those changes but that could get easier and easier to accomplish.
Location: The bustling, world-renowned downtown of Pataskala, OH
188 posts, read 197,998 times
Reputation: 129
Or, North Dakota could do whatever the he11 they wanted to do with their land without the federal government having any authority whatsoever to tell them what to do as was intended. But since we passed that point about 75 years before I was born, yeah.
We should also lobby Obama, in the unlikely event he is re-elected. I read in the WSJ interview it could bring in enough to pay the national debt. Also that ND is pulling in so much money it may drop both the property and income tax.
Oil sands/shale Natural gas resources. Beautiful country is going to be mowed down in the name of energy independence.
Until its in most folks back yards, its going to keep going.
I see you may not have seen some of the ND people talking about how low unemployment is up that way. Also, you haven't read any ads for jobs in ND. I guess they just don't seem to want to hear the environmentalists since they like money too much. When treehuggers start playing games those people may pull their weapons and use their 2nd Amendment rights.
Maybe you need to check out the per capita figures for all 50 states concerning the amount of money being made.
We should also lobby Obama, in the unlikely event he is re-elected. I read in the WSJ interview it could bring in enough to pay the national debt. Also that ND is pulling in so much money it may drop both the property and income tax.
The thing about this one that really bothers Obama is that without drilling offshore we can become energy independent along with Canada. Obama doesn't want to see that happen.
We will soon be shipping more money to canada as that is where energy companies are now investing in new oil reserves of all tpyes. the there wil also be more shipped from middle east and other l;ocations. its alrteady decided by the refining projects that are being built now. mnay refieries will double their capacity which alos means that other will be liely shutdown.Also the amout of CNG being shipped into the coutry will really increase with new terminals.
We will soon be shipping more money to canada as that is where energy companies are now investing in new oil reserves of all tpyes. the there wil also be more shipped from middle east and other l;ocations. its alrteady decided by the refining projects that are being built now. mnay refieries will double their capacity which alos means that other will be liely shutdown.Also the amout of CNG being shipped into the coutry will really increase with new terminals.
Better canada than China or the ME. But If we can do it on our own that would be best.
Better canada than China or the ME. But If we can do it on our own that would be best.
Just like what we're doing in the Marcellus Shale formation in our own backyard here in Pa. I'm against oil production in the U.S. though, because we can't keep 100% of our own oil
Just like what we're doing in the Marcellus Shale formation in our own backyard here in Pa. I'm against oil production in the U.S. though, because we can't keep 100% of our own oil
it is land rape no 2 ways about it and as you say they put it on the world market.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.