Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-05-2011, 12:33 PM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,505,038 times
Reputation: 1775

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
You are incorrect, what this did was put a cap on what the banks could charge merchants for processing fees.

That was pretty much what I said.

But lets use your words, if it makes you feel better.

The cap on merchant fees helps the merchants, but not the consumer.

This did jack for the little guy, it was all about helping Walmart and such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2011, 12:33 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,587,085 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by jy_2007 View Post
you're free to move your money to an institution that charges less fees.

GO CAPITALALISMISM!!!11!!
Yep, they can charge fees and customers can leave. Netflix just learned that lesson. Local banks should be licking their chops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2011, 12:37 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
it is not just BoA who is going to charge fees. It is all because of this government and their stupid rules for banks that is now costing the people who hardly can't afford it to pay even more.

Obama is the cause of all these fees due to his policies!


Obama is the cause of corporate greed?

Who knew?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2011, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcar Overkill View Post
I couldn't quote the law verbatim because it is over the character limit by a good deal.
Here is a link to the amendment instead:Congressional Record - 111th Congress (2009-2010) - THOMAS (Library of Congress)#
Sounds like a good idea, as it probably led the small businesses I speak of, to lift the restrictions. I can now go ahead and use my debit card, even for $10 or less than they weren't very happy about earlier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2011, 12:40 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,867,563 times
Reputation: 18304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
No, merchants pay a percentage of the transaction for the customer to swipe their card. Fees vary, depending on the type of card (V, MC, Amex) used and the Merchant Services processor.
On debt cards the previous fee was 44 cents which merchants added to product cost. How its limited to 22 cents by new regualtions. Its called transperancy by those favoring it allowing consumer to see what they pay ;one way or the other for service.It alos has the effect of not spreadig the cost allowing thoswe who use but not enough to pay for servcing account to pay. Its also diallows other fees or redcue in bankig maeanig they will make moeny other places or elinaite some accounts. We have seen that in credit cards. Some Likw Amex already charged fees to mnay.Bascially you ply ;you pay one way or the others. But it more visible showing that nohting is free as the saying goes.It also discouages spending on crdit card by not allowing it to be profitable to extend credit to the uncredit worthy by not allowing tranfer of risk.Retailers esepcailly large one love the new debt card rules as it cuts their cost by 22 cents per item.Its passed on directly to the consumertrnasperant/directly.Mnay will decide not to have a debt card and some maybe dropped i the end because of service cost just like some credit cards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2011, 12:43 PM
 
5,064 posts, read 5,730,610 times
Reputation: 4770
I own a business and we accept debit/credit cards. I don't mind paying the fees because we are profitting when we make a sale. The fees just come out of the profit. Our prices are controlled by competition, so we can only charge what people would be willing to pay. So the fees did not raise our prices.
Walmart & other retailers aren't going to lower their prices. Consumers are just going to pay more. HBSC is charging 35 cents per debit transaction after 8 per month, so customers are now paying per transaction instead of the businesses.

As a business owner, I have always been willing to accept the small fees in exchange for more business that comes by accepting the cards. As a consumer, it is insane to be asked to pay a fee in order to spend my own money. The government should have stayed out of this. Doing Wal-Mart's bidding at the cost of the consumer is crazy.

We bank at a small local bank. I agree with the earlier suggestions that those of you still at the big banks need to look at your local options and credit unions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2011, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentwoodgirl View Post
I own a business and we accept debit/credit cards. I don't mind paying the fees because we are profitting when we make a sale. The fees just come out of the profit. Our prices are controlled by competition, so we can only charge what people would be willing to pay. So the fees did not raise our prices.
Walmart & other retailers aren't going to lower their prices. Consumers are just going to pay more. HBSC is charging 35 cents per debit transaction after 8 per month, so customers are now paying per transaction instead of the consumers.

As a business owner, I have always been willing to accept the small fees in exchange for more business that comes by accepting the cards. As a consumer, it is insane to be asked to pay a fee in order to spend my own money. The government should have stayed out of this. Doing Wal-Mart's bidding at the cost of the consumer is crazy.

We bank at a small local bank. I agree with the earlier suggestions that those of you still at the big banks need to look at your local options and credit unions.
Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2011, 12:53 PM
 
5,064 posts, read 5,730,610 times
Reputation: 4770
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Why?
Because the banks are adding fees, the premise of this whole thread. And the retailers aren't going to lower their prices.
So one of two things will happen now:
1. Enough people will leave these banks that they will rethink their policy and stop charging the fees. (But more than likely add on fees somewhere else or take away some benefits).
2. This will stay th way it is, essentially transferring money from the average person to Walmart and other big box retailers. So Durbin is helping Walmart make a much larger profit at the expense of each of us.


Whatever happens, the consumers are the losers in this regulation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2011, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentwoodgirl View Post
Because the banks are adding fees, the premise of this whole thread. And the retailers aren't going to lower their prices.
So one of two things will happen now:
1. Enough people will leave these banks that they will rethink their policy and stop charging the fees. (But more than likely add on fees somewhere else or take away some benefits).
2. This will stay th way it is, essentially transferring money from the average person to Walmart and other big box retailers. So Durbin is helping Walmart make a much larger profit at the expense of each of us.


Whatever happens, the consumers are the losers in this regulation.
Strange to see that argument after being told repeatedly how competition can reduce prices, and customers benefit with lower costs, as opposed to tax increases that businesses inevitably pass to customers.

As it is right now, the people who choose to play to the whims of banks will pay. If I were supposed to pay $10 to a retailer on Sep 30, I would still be paying $10. Although, the retailed will stand to save some, adding to their profit. And I would rather have them take extra cash than the banks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2011, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,520,038 times
Reputation: 3899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcar Overkill View Post
That was pretty much what I said.

But lets use your words, if it makes you feel better.

The cap on merchant fees helps the merchants, but not the consumer.

This did jack for the little guy, it was all about helping Walmart and such.
What you said was it would not charge the merchants. But none the less, it isn't about what makes me feel better...you see, I am one of those little guys and as a small business owner until there is real reform in this country measures such as this isn't going to make a difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top