Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Interesting. This looks like a plan. Is it credible?
[quote]WHEREAS THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION PROVIDES:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Last edited by CaseyB; 10-19-2011 at 04:53 PM..
Reason: copyright, too long
WHEREAS THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION PROVIDES:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
WE, THE NINETY-NINE PERCENT OF THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA...
That's where they lose all credibility. They like to think that they "represent" virtually everyone in the country, but they don't. Not by a long shot.
Funny, they always mention Iraq and Afghanistan.. and yet.. always forget that their beloved Czar also has us in Libya. Hmm.
So that is the only thing you find fault with the plan. Well then we are off to a very good start. If you can agree with everything else, I am sure we can have that added. Thanks for your participation.
So that is the only thing you find fault with the plan. Well then we are off to a very good start. If you can agree with everything else, I am sure we can have that added. Thanks for your participation.
Actually I don't. I left my hipster glasses at my parents house, my dirty jeans are in the other room, and I haven't used the new hipster phrase "Frack" at all today.
Do we need to change the way our tax system works? Of course we do. I think very few people would disagree with that.
I'm iffy with a single payer system. Just saying the sentence is OK -- but to see HOW the system works is what matters. Just not "having a single payer system". Not totally against it, but would rather see details.
I DON'T think we should be paying for out of country citizens with "emergency medicaid" We already have the illegals sucking us dry (in a bad way), this will just allow them to continue to leech.
What's the point in "1 man, 1 woman"? This will eventually evolve into 1 man, 1 woman + 2 more of color. Can't they just vote for "2 people" ?
And, from what it looks like, people over 18 can vote.. regardless of being registered? That seems like more hugs and kisses to the illegals. (at least, to me)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
