Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Where have I made that opinion? quote or admit the lie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus
What is the "current" way of abortion? Legal in the first 6 weeks (don't need a doctor's approval in most states), after that you are required to get a second opinion (nearly all states) and third trimester abortions have to be done only if its a matter of life or death for the mother..
You believe abortions in the third trimester should be severely restricted to life and death,thereby forcing women to go to butchers like the abortionist in Philly....
Quote:
You're just another anti-women , woman hating, control freak.
Yet I am the one wanting NO restrictions or ANY federal government involvement in abortion at all...
They come from your creator. Not from some random government bureaucratic official. That means they can never be removed or distributed or circumvented. That's the entire point.
Then how come animals don't have any of these rights?
I didn't lump you into those who are 'pro-some choice',I included you int he group that shouldn't get to decide what another person does with their body.
Well, I'm on board with pregnant women looking at ultra-sounds before an abortion. But just to be fair, I think those protesting abortions ought to be forced to view a video of an amatuer doctor performing a kitchen table abortion... just to be fair.
Are you kidding? They would LOVE to see women butchered....that's their whole agenda! Punish those Evil Women for have fun sex!!! It's their hope and plan....deviates...
Mandating that a woman see the ultra-sound before abortion
On the third day of President Obama's term in office, he lifted the ban on the Mexico policy, which in short opens the flood gate of funds to international abortion facilities through out the world. To me, there seems to be something intrinsically wrong with this. I think we as a nation should encourage life, not fund the destruction of the innocent as Obama has done by lifting this ban.
I think its important that both parties responsible should see the ultra-sound, as it could save a lot of pain for someone down the road.
I love the idea for a woman to see her baby before she decides to take his/her life. I dont know the percentage, but it is I believe 70% or higher that the woman will keep her baby once she sees her child.
For a woman to murder their own child is pure selfishness. They will forever live to regret their decision forever once they understand that they killed their own flesh and blood. Abortion is the sickest legal "right" we have on the books, and it's speaks volumes about the character of many Americans when 1/2 of us support the slaughter of a human being just because they don't want to have to deal with their responsibility. A woman's right?? What about the right of that boy or girl that is about to be executed?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
,I included you int he group that shouldn't get to decide what another person does with their body.
Can someone tell me what the graphic rural posted is of? Thanks. 
Mandating that a woman see the ultra-sound before abortion
