Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2011, 04:12 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,869,839 times
Reputation: 3315

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Newt seemed to admit to these charges.




Washingtonpost.com: House Reprimands, Penalizes Speaker
And AFTER your 1997 article Newt was cleared of all charges which means no ethics violations were found.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2011, 04:14 PM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,924,874 times
Reputation: 1578
How about Maxine Waters and Charles Rangels ethics violations???

They may not be running for POTUS but why do they even still have seats?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,869,839 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
How about Maxine Waters and Charles Rangels ethics violations???

They may not be running for POTUS but why do they even still have seats?
Those are black Democrats, ethics violations don't apply to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 04:17 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,239,170 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
How about Maxine Waters and Charles Rangels ethics violations???

They may not be running for POTUS but why do they even still have seats?
Because they are Democrats who NEVER EVER do anything unethical.

It's was a Republican smear campaign which Democrats would never attempt...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 04:22 PM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,439,885 times
Reputation: 31001
Looks like its going to be newt by default as theres really no one left standing for the GOP..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 04:22 PM
Sco
 
4,259 posts, read 4,929,181 times
Reputation: 3373
Newt's frontrunner status proves that most of today's Republicans have zero principles. They will vote for any scumbag as long as they are not a Democrat.

Maybe a conservative Republican can explain to me how Newt fits in with the supposed values of their party, particularly the Teapublicans.

1. Social conservative (family values) - This really needs no explanation. Newt protects the sanctity of marriage one affair and divorce at a time.

2. Lobbyists/Special Interest politics - Newt is the epitome of the sleazeball cash for favors politician. The scandals with Fannie Mae and the health care industry are just the tip of the iceberg. He practically invented the current "highest bidder" legislative process.

3. Disdain for lifelong politicians and Washington politics (the Palin Real Americans remember) - Newt is the very definition of an inside the beltway Washington insider. When he is not holding or running for public office, he makes a ton of money lobbying others that are for whatever special interest writes the largest check.

Please tell me why any Tea Party type person would vote for an insider, sleazeball adulterous scumbag like Newt Gingrich?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:04 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,974,155 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
Newt was cleared of the charges, why don't you mention that part?
Where do you get your information from the Onion? Really, I mean where do you guys come up with this stuff. The IRS cleared him of IRS fraud. He was still found guilty of ethics violations and had to pay the 300,000 fine. It was a bipartisan committee that found him guilty. Not to mention the fact that he admitted guilt.

Washingtonpost.com: Gingrich Pays Off Ethics Penalty
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,869,839 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Where do you get your information from the Onion? Really, I mean where do you guys come up with this stuff. The IRS cleared him of IRS fraud. He was still found guilty of ethics violations and had to pay the 300,000 fine. It was a bipartisan committee that found him guilty. Not to mention the fact that he admitted guilt.

Washingtonpost.com: Gingrich Pays Off Ethics Penalty

The Ethics committee dropped all charges against Newt. This is common knowledge... well for educated people it is.

Washingtonpost.com: Ethics Committee Drops Last of 84 Ethics Charges Against Gingrich
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:10 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,053,810 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Not only is Newt a scumbag with the women. He is also an unethical politician. He has lied and admitted to lieing. His own party rebuked him and cast him like old garbage. People seem to have short term memory problems.

"The House voted overwhelmingly yesterday to reprimand House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and order him to pay an unprecedented $300,000 penalty, the first time in the House's 208-year history it has disciplined a speaker for ethical wrongdoing.


The ethics case and its resolution leave Gingrich with little leeway for future personal controversies, House Republicans said. Exactly one month before yesterday's vote, Gingrich admitted that he brought discredit to the House and broke its rules by failing to ensure that financing for two projects would not violate federal tax law and by giving the House ethics committee false information.

"Newt has done some things that have embarrassed House Republicans and embarrassed the House," said Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.). "If [the voters] see more of that, they will question our judgment."

Washingtonpost.com: House Reprimands, Penalizes Speaker
LOL. San Fran Nan didn't forget and announced to the world she hadn't and would turn over some top secret info she and her committee had dug up. She just forgot that would have been an ethics violation too so shut her big trap. What a pack of idiots we have running this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:12 PM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,986,369 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Where do you get your information from the Onion? Really, I mean where do you guys come up with this stuff. The IRS cleared him of IRS fraud. He was still found guilty of ethics violations and had to pay the 300,000 fine. It was a bipartisan committee that found him guilty. Not to mention the fact that he admitted guilt.

Washingtonpost.com: Gingrich Pays Off Ethics Penalty
It must really **** you off that (in your mind) Newt is guilty of all this bad stuff ... but no one cares and Newt keeps climbing the polls ...

Do you sleep at night?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top