Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-03-2012, 09:01 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,244,094 times
Reputation: 4985

Advertisements

A huge and long overdue win for public health | McClatchy (http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/12/27/134167/a-huge-and-long-overdue-win-for.html - broken link)

I'm referring to the ruling the Obama administration unveiled Dec. 21 to control toxic mercury pollution from coal-burning power plants. These rules have been 21 years in the making, and now, at long last, they will bring Americans some relief from a pervasive toxin.

Now we have taken aim at another Public Enemy: mercury. The president deserves enormous credit for sticking with his plan despite furious opposition from some in the power industry and their allies on Capitol Hill.

Every year, U.S. power plants release almost 50 tons of mercury into the environment. When coal is burned, some of the mercury in it deposits locally and some can travel hundreds of miles to contaminate rivers, lakes, animals, plants and ultimately our bodies. Mercury is highly toxic

Industry lobbyists have always complained about measures to protect the environment and public health. The Clean Air Act would lead to the "collapse of entire industries," said the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in 1971. Phasing out CFCs would kill the refrigeration business. Removing lead from gasoline would mean huge price hikes. Despite these wild predictions, the sky never fell, the American economy continued to prosper, and costs have been far outweighed by the public health benefits. The Clean Air Act, for example, has dramatically reduced asthma

Surely someone here will object to this!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2012, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Well it only took 30 years for the government to finally say arsenic in livestock food is bad and they've asked for voluntary removal of it.

So Americans just need to wait a few decades for government to step up to their job of regulating ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,874 posts, read 26,521,399 times
Reputation: 25773
I wonder how long it will take for the goverment to ban mercury from light bulbs????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 11:51 AM
 
45,231 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24988
Another example of the "gubemit gonna protect us" fallacy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 11:54 AM
 
2,083 posts, read 1,621,351 times
Reputation: 1406
We can all look forward to the near future when millions of CFL lightbulbs find their way to local garbage dumps and leak mercury into our water supplies.

If you think that the majority of people are going to drive around looking for somewhere to recycle their light bulbs instead of just chucking them into the trash, you're kidding yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 05:48 PM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,935,208 times
Reputation: 1119
The most amazing part of this is the fact that the biggest source of mercury toxicity for most people is in their head. Lot of money still being made from that and it is the least talked about issue regarding mercury. Yet tuna, products and environment are being regulated and talked to death. Though some progress appears to being made here to get mercury amalgam gone for good.

It reminds me of how the sun was vilified as this horrible source of killing radiation and cancer, yet nuclear (the elephant) much less other regular exposures w/ xrays and cat scans etc... are "good" for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:35 PM
 
Location: Lewes, Delaware
3,490 posts, read 3,793,626 times
Reputation: 1953
I don't think the mercury I played with as a youngster affected me nearly as much as eating those paint chips.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 07:43 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 29 days ago)
 
27,651 posts, read 16,142,781 times
Reputation: 19075
Quote:
Originally Posted by James420 View Post
I don't think the mercury I played with as a youngster affected me nearly as much as eating those paint chips.
Imagine what could have been......*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 08:08 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,473,584 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
Industry lobbyists have always complained about measures to protect the environment and public health. The Clean Air Act would lead to the "collapse of entire industries," said the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in 1971. Phasing out CFCs would kill the refrigeration business. Removing lead from gasoline would mean huge price hikes. Despite these wild predictions, the sky never fell, the American economy continued to prosper, and costs have been far outweighed by the public health benefits. The Clean Air Act, for example, has dramatically reduced asthma
Quote:
The number of people with asthma continues to grow. One in 12 people (about 25 million, or 8% of the population) had asthma in 2009, compared with 1 in 14 (about 20 million, or 7%) in 2001.19
Asthma Statistics | AAAAI

Besides the fact that the HFC refrigerants that have "replaced" (you still have 100's of tons of CFC out there) the CFC's (which are still being produced by the way) have a higher GWP (Global Warming Potential).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 08:24 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,775,066 times
Reputation: 6856
If businesses are not free to poison people with mercury is anyone truly free?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top