Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2012, 12:02 PM
 
11,531 posts, read 10,292,202 times
Reputation: 3580

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
So you feel that separating people by race and causing them to fight is funny? How interesting.
No, I feel that making fun of the idiot author is funny.

Last edited by CaseyB; 01-15-2012 at 03:14 PM.. Reason: off topic/keep to the thread topic, please
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2012, 12:18 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
One liberal does not represent all liberals, just as Larry Craig doesn't represent all conservatives. (Or does he? )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2012, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,291,070 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
Evidently now if you support a polite, white man for president vs. an incumbent polite black president, you're a racist.

In Romney's Campaign, What's Race Got to Do With It? - NYTimes.com
Yes, the hat trick for bigoted threads!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2012, 12:39 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,995,315 times
Reputation: 7060
Liberal Democrats hate white people, especially white men. Not exactly a newsflash, but it surprises me that it surprises others to learn that 'tolerant' liberals are actually some of the biggest racists and bigots you'll ever meet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2012, 12:41 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,939,504 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
Sorry, his "vulture capitalism" that I object to, skin color has zero to do with that.
Do you prefer venture fascism as practiced by Obama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2012, 12:42 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
Evidently now if you support a polite, white man for president vs. an incumbent polite black president, you're a racist.
Not only that, the author says that whiteness is equivalent to insincerity and a small-town mentality.

I think nothing wrong with white pride. Every other ethnic group takes pride in who they are, so why should it be any different for whites?


Quote:
Originally Posted by renault View Post
Liberal Democrats hate white people, especially white men. Not exactly a newsflash, but it surprises me that it surprises others to learn that 'tolerant' liberals are actually some of the biggest racists and bigots you'll ever meet.
Absolutely wrong. Generalizations like that are a great example of what is wrong with today's political discourse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2012, 12:46 PM
 
Location: South Dakota
2,608 posts, read 2,097,732 times
Reputation: 769
Just as I wouldn't expect anyone to feel guilty about their race, I feel no guilt about my whiteness, Im as white as white can be

I think Sanitorium is whiter than Mitt

Id like to think MLK wouldn't approve of trash like this article

Then again Marxist's love this kind of stuff...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2012, 01:29 PM
 
1,332 posts, read 1,990,286 times
Reputation: 1183
Default Talking about white interlopers...

Has the NY Times yet been able to find any models that are women of color for it's Sunday fashion section. I stopped reading it about a year ago, and it amazed me how hypocritical this rag sheet is. Every Sunday I would look at the fashion section trying to spot the token non-white model...And, there were far and few in between.

Have they changed yet?....Somehow I would guess not..Money is more important than integrity to them...and their advertisers know who the biggest spenders on women's wear are...And the NY times will give those advertisers their moneys' worth.

Which makes thier ultra liberal crap even more hypocritical...(Though, not all countries or groups are held equally responsible for indescretions...are they?)

And their whiter-than-white writers are always there to defend the poor black people who they seem to think can't stand on their own 2 feet...Like President Obama, that surely is a victim of racism at the hands of anyone that may not want to vote for him... Or even question anything about him or his policies.

Why wasn't there equal mention given to Obama, with his history of activism and work and religious affiliation being blacker-than-black?

Oh, I know!...He is a person of color, and he was simply participating and acting within the culture group he was part of....Which is OK....But, not OK if you're white...Right?

The NY Times and it's writers (including the hypocrite O'Reilly, that whores himself to get an article published) is more and more irrelevant at time goes by.

And what is even worse is the fact that the whacky ultra-left are going to do as much damage to President Obama than the dysfunctional Republicans are going to do to whoever their candidate will finally be.

Obama seems to be the one changing. Perhaps doing so as he realizes that as President he has a responsibility to the country - not to an ideal.

So, people like mysref are more prone to favor him for re-election...

But, with the crap coming from the left, many of us are thinking if the left cannot accept change, and he is of the left, maybe he is just doing a side-show for those of us in the middle...And we should not take a chance...A fanatical liberal is a fanatical liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2012, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,291,070 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by migee View Post
Has the NY Times yet been able to find any models that are women of color for it's Sunday fashion section. I stopped reading it about a year ago, and it amazed me how hypocritical this rag sheet is. Every Sunday I would look at the fashion section trying to spot the token non-white model...And, there were far and few in between.

Have they changed yet?....Somehow I would guess not..Money is more important than integrity to them...and their advertisers know who the biggest spenders on women's wear are...And the NY times will give those advertisers their moneys' worth.

Which makes thier ultra liberal crap even more hypocritical...(Though, not all countries or groups are held equally responsible for indescretions...are they?)

And their whiter-than-white writers are always there to defend the poor black people who they seem to think can't stand on their own 2 feet...Like President Obama, that surely is a victim of racism at the hands of anyone that may not want to vote for him... Or even question anything about him or his policies.

Why wasn't there equal mention given to Obama, with his history of activism and work and religious affiliation being blacker-than-black?

Oh, I know!...He is a person of color, and he was simply participating and acting within the culture group he was part of....Which is OK....But, not OK if you're white...Right?

The NY Times and it's writers (including the hypocrite O'Reilly, that whores himself to get an article published) is more and more irrelevant at time goes by.

And what is even worse is the fact that the whacky ultra-left are going to do as much damage to President Obama than the dysfunctional Republicans are going to do to whoever their candidate will finally be.

Obama seems to be the one changing. Perhaps doing so as he realizes that as President he has a responsibility to the country - not to an ideal.

So, people like mysref are more prone to favor him for re-election...

But, with the crap coming from the left, many of us are thinking if the left cannot accept change, and he is of the left, maybe he is just doing a side-show for those of us in the middle...And we should not take a chance...A fanatical liberal is a fanatical liberal.
Your post makes no sense and what you may trying to be communicating is wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2012, 02:12 PM
 
Location: The Nanny State of MD
1,438 posts, read 1,146,353 times
Reputation: 510
And I thought conservative, especialy white conservatives, were suposed to be racist. Huh, silly me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top