Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2012, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,761 posts, read 14,656,809 times
Reputation: 18534

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQConvict View Post
. . . those lefty idiots who call Rush Limbaugh a fat drug-addict.
He's not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2012, 04:02 PM
 
684 posts, read 1,151,105 times
Reputation: 910
The character and quality of the anti-Maddow comments says it all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Twin Cities, MN
779 posts, read 537,522 times
Reputation: 221
Yeah she is so unknown and inconsequential that she drives the lunatic fringe even loonier.

GOSH! LET ME START A THREAD TO DISCUSS A PERSON OF NO IMPORTANCE. Logic fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 07:55 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by sky1949 View Post
The character and quality of the anti-Maddow comments says it all.


Hey, I'm anti-Maddow, but I gave her credit for being more known, than Andrew is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 08:00 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,196,047 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Hey, I'm anti-Maddow, but I gave her credit for being more known, than Andrew is.
Not only more well known but a hell of a lot smarter than Breity!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,112 posts, read 30,632,033 times
Reputation: 16395
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
In other words, she can't be a good host because you don't like her looks. I guess a woman can't have something valuable to say unless she's a ditsy blond, like the other channel has.

Yep, apparently you have to dye your hair blonde, wear a few lbs of makeup, get some fake breasts and wear form fitting clothing to be considered a woman to some people... I guess when your anchors and commentators have nothing of value to say, dressing them up and making them 'pretty' is the only way to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 09:01 AM
 
46,963 posts, read 25,998,208 times
Reputation: 29454
There'll always be a bigger market for eye candy than brain candy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 10:57 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,776,567 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
Nobody said anything about a crime taking place and this has nothing to do with any "physical standards". The left clearly loves Maddow and they truly believe that she's on par with other national news media personalities when in reality they're the only people who know who she is. You can try to twist and sidestep this all you want, I'm not making fun of Maddow as much as I'm making fun of the idiots who love him.
Maddow is better than most news personalities, because she's far more intelligent than the rest. Yes, she has a liberal bias and I'm not denying that. But it is also can't to deny she's brilliant and better educated than probably anyone on this board.

Only those who can't see past their own ridiculous ideologies and hate for the other side would try to deny that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 11:02 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,776,567 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
I guess that is not the issue.

1. I don't care how she looks
2. I don't watch her on television
3. Anyone can look however they want to look, in my book


However, do not tell me that "she" is the "norm" of what a "woman" should look like. That is not a chick. She is not straight. She is not the "norm" for women in the US. I am not sure that "she" is a woman.
Is Marirska Hargitay not a real woman? Afterall, she had short hair for several years on TV.



2010 Mariska Hargitay short hairstyle | Hair Planet

How about Natalie Portman? Omg, she's so unwomanly looking!

elposlepea: natalie portman short hair pictures « Any Celeb



What exactly about Maddow is so unwomanly? Just because she has short hair and doesn't wear tons of makeup and low cut dresses?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
I suppose being an annoying wise ass makes her unfeminine to much of the world. I find watching her to be entertaining and informative but then I like women that are smart, informed, annoying wise asses. They keep me thinking. And laughing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top