Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If it's such a great expose. Why would they give not reveal their sources of the persons or person who claims David Brock is on drugs?
Use of anonymous sources is standard operating procedure for the MSM. Pick up any random copy of the NYT and you're going to find 'unnamed sources,' 'a source close to the admin,' etc. being quoted. I don't really like it either, but we can't have one standard for the NYT and another for the Daily Caller.
Use of anonymous sources is standard operating procedure for the MSM. Pick up any random copy of the NYT and you're going to find 'unnamed sources,' 'a source close to the admin,' etc. being quoted. I don't really like it either, but we can't have one standard for the NYT and another for the Daily Caller.
The NYT routinely violates its policy on anonymous sources. They are horrible when it come to this. Never the less, I doubt they would stoop this low. What credible reason would there be to hide the names here?
This is a pure hatchet job, too cowardly to name the sources. Right wing hypocrites love it because it goes after MM. Period.
The NYT routinely violates its policy on anonymous sources. They are horrible when it come to this. Never the less, I doubt they would stoop this low. What credible reason would there be to hide the names here?
This is a pure hatchet job, too cowardly to name the sources. Right wing hypocrites love it because it goes after MM. Period.
OK then, good link--I think it's safe to say that there are hypocrites on both sides on this issue. The use of anonymous sources has been a pet peeve. That was part of how Jayson Blair (disgraced NYT reporter) was able get away with what he did for so long.
If I was Brock, I'd be all over the Daily Caller for defamation and libel. Everything in that "expose" is based on heresay. Everything. "A staffer told us," "said one employee,' etc. I'd get a law degree just to do it.
If I was Brock, I'd be all over the Daily Caller for defamation and libel. Everything in that "expose" is based on heresay. Everything. "A staffer told us," "said one employee,' etc. I'd get a law degree just to do it.
Use of anonymous sources is standard operating procedure for the MSM. Pick up any random copy of the NYT and you're going to find 'unnamed sources,' 'a source close to the admin,' etc. being quoted. I don't really like it either, but we can't have one standard for the NYT and another for the Daily Caller.
Why is Media matters TAX EXEMPT?
Also this.
Taxpayers have effectively been supporting Media Matters in its campaign to get advertisers to "Drop Fox,"--words billboarded on its website along with "NewsCorpwatch" that link viewers to form letters to send to advertisers to get them to stop advertising on the network.
The U.S. government is also effectively supporting the website's attacks on News Corp's attempt to buy Great Britain's BSkyB, a satellite broadcaster. And taxpayers are effectively supporting the nonprofit's demands to Congress to investigate News Corp. and its head, Rupert Murdoch.
Hell, Georgie Porgy Stephanopolous brought up contraception at a Republican debate before the present controversy even was on the radar. Prophet? Psychic? Naaaaw!
Ha! Opinion piece by Tucker Carlson. Brock...a FORMER GOP HITMAN...has turned the nutjobs seriously on end.
Too funny.
I head Carlson state that one of those former Media Matters clowns who ratted to him say that he even named lefties at WAPO who would print anything if nobody else would. You are pretty funny when you get your far left thinking going. This was very little opinion piece in that they mentioned names of former MM people. Saying that they talked with Obama's main advisor, Valerie Jarrett in the White House can be proved by looking at that transparent list of visitors to the White House and who they saw.
Which part of the series did you read, anyway? I know but you might as well admit it. Your post was one of the most purely deflection efforts I have seen in days.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
