Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher
|
Additional info....
Review of Matters Related to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) Retired Military Analyst Outreach Activities
(Report No. DoDIG-2012-25)
http://www.dodig.mil/Ir/reports/RMAT...11redacted.pdf
Rumsfeld-Era Propaganda Program Whitewashed by Pentagon
Rumsfeld-Era Propaganda Program Whitewashed by Pentagon
Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand
Message Machine - Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand - Series - NYTimes.com
Those would make great "WANTED" posters.
By the way, not one single one of those pukes ever saw a nuclear weapon in their entire life. They couldn't tell the difference between a 3rd Shop and a field storage site.
Anyway, those articles and the government report are about a Psy-Ops Warfare program used against the American people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher
The leading promoters of war in the media are right wing, pro-Israeli, neocons employed by conservative think tanks.
|
Actually, they are left-wing.
There was a man, a Jew, named VI Lenin. Lenin was studying in Paris. Someone stuck Lenin on train and sent him back to Moscow with his entourage knowing that he would start a revolution and overthrow the Russian government, which would ultimately result in Russia bowing out of WW I.
Lenin had a friend, a Jew, named Leon Trotsky, and the two of them (and other Jewish friends) were successful in the overthrow. Afterward, Lenin turned on Trotsky. Trotsky fled to Mexico in 1929 and was assassinated in 1940 by the GRU.
Before Trotsky was assassinated, he was very influential among Jews in America. With his help, a group of Jews formed the Young People's Socialist League. The Young People's Socialist League eventually merged with the Social Democratic Party of America, becoming the YPSL/SDA.
The leadership within the YPSL co-opted the SDA party members and gained control of the YPSL/SDA, which was ultimately renamed as the Social Democrat Party.
It remained that until 1974 when the Social Democrats emerged under the aegis of neo-conservatism, a phrase actually coined by the US media and not themselves.
Anyway, I would recommend that you read
Two Cheers for Capitalism by William Kristol and the
Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism by Daniel Bell, both published around 1976 explaining their new position and why they abandoned their social democratic beliefs to improve your understanding.
They are anything but right-wing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher
and Neocons which are a much smaller group of primarily right wing Jews, with dual loyalty to Israel, who manufacture propaganda in the US designed to further Israeli interests.
|
Left-wing. And they have tremendous support from Democrats, who introduce nearly all of bills that are ultimately US tax-payer gits to Israel.
My favorite is Daniel Inouye-D formerly of California but now of Hawaii, who fell over backwards to give $8 Million US tax dollars to the French government to build private Jewish schools exclusively for Jewish school children in France.
I was always under the impression that France was the greatest super-power that ever existed in the Universe, including parallel and alternate universes which theoretically may or may not exist.
I never dreamed France was a 3rd World Country and couldn't find a $8 Million to build schools.
Historically...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979
The definition of a Neo conservative is one who believes in the spread of democracy throughout the world either through direct, or indirect military power.
|
Congratulations, you just failed both Political Science
and International Relations. That's incredibly difficult to do, but you did it quite well.
Consider that classical Liberals come in two flavors, interventionist and non-interventionist.
Academically...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majordomo
We aren't considering attacking Iran because they are developing a nuclear bomb. We are concerned that they will develop nuclear technology that may give them the ability to produce a nuclear weapon.
|
No, that is not why.
Iran is acting in its own selfish interest and desires to sell oil and natural gas in a currency other than US Dollars.
If that will have a long term net negative affect on your economy, then you need to make the changes necessary to your economy to deal with that, even it if means another 6 Million Americans become permanently unemployed forever and your standard of living permanently declines.
Monetarily...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiellgood
Should the US wait until iran has nuclear missiles capable of reaching the US homeland? Is that the moronic foreign policy you and the other far left, ron paul idiots, and other losers espouse?
|
When Iran tests a thermonuclear (fission-fusion) device, then by all means have it at.
Until then, a 1 kt uranium-based device mounted on an ICBM that can be destroyed by an anti-ballistic missile system such as the one the US possesses is no threat.
Just thought I'd point that out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiellgood
Nice try muslim terrorist supporter, but I support a crushing war to terminate the iranian and syrian illegitimate terrorist regimes - and don't work for a "conservative think tank." I guess that does not compute in your brain.
|
Do you support a war to terminate US backed terrorist regimes?
Because if you don't, then that would make you an hypocrite.
So, are you? An hypocrite?
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiellgood
A childish poster unable to address my points, so she makes personal innuendo and comments...no surprise there.
When you grow up and can debate points, let us know.
|
You have an habit of refusing to respond to facts thrown in your face, so one who lives in a glass house should not be throwing stones.
It's not terrorism when the US does it...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB
Iran has long been one of the leading state sponsors of terrorism worldwide.
|
So has the US. When are you going to attack yourselves?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB
Their pursuit of nuclear weapons and a robust ballistic missile capability continues apace.
|
Naturally, you don't have any evidence. Even the IAEA claims Iran is enriching uranium to 20% which precludes the possibility of Iran producing plutonium.
How embarrassing is that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB
An emboldened Iran has vicariously waged war against America for nearly three decades...
|
Aside from waging war against the Iranian people for 40 years prior to the abdication of the Shah, what exactly did the US do for Iran?
Iran does have a legitimate
casus belli. Refusing to acknowledge that does not alter the facts.
Former US government terrorist...
Mircea