Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2012, 06:23 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,028,424 times
Reputation: 5455

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by filihok View Post
Washing your hands.

The horror!!!!!
LOL. Exactly. All these studies and who knows how much money thrown away to do em and they come up with wash your hands. Duh who woulda ever thunk of that? Certainly not a liberal. They have to be told to do so by the government first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2012, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,321,370 times
Reputation: 6658
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
LOL. Exactly. All these studies and who knows how much money thrown away to do em and they come up with wash your hands. Duh who woulda ever thunk of that? Certainly not a liberal. They have to be told to do so by the government first.
So...since the EPA is suggesting that people wash their hands and a liberal certainly could not have thunk of that, then the EPA must be a conservative organization. Correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2012, 06:35 PM
 
6,565 posts, read 14,304,273 times
Reputation: 3229
This thread is hysterical...

"Oooooo, there's this report that beach sand might not be great for children!!! Fargin' government!!! Now they're gonna force us to wear wet suits on the beach and they're gonna pave it over with epoxy!!! BASTARDS!!!"

"umm, actually the EPA is just letting everyone know what they found. You can make what you want out of the info they provided.."

"Errrrrrrrrrrr..... Ummmmmmmmm..... Yeah, the COST!!! THAT is what I'm upset about!!! How DARE they spend MY tax money on such a study... "

LOL!!! You couldn't even make up your mind what upset you about it... Just saw EPA and figured it was another reason to whine...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2012, 07:14 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,028,424 times
Reputation: 5455
If you can't see how insanely stupid this study is then your more lost than gilligan ever was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2012, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,557,218 times
Reputation: 27720
They can't keep the beach clean.
They are proposing you wash your hands after digging in the sand.

Gosh it's a wonder any of us are alive if you went to the beach as a kid.
How many gritty, sandy sandwiches did you eat ?

I don't recall getting sick after going to the beach though.
Must be pollution has caught up with us.

A better job for the EPA is how to prevent this crap from happening in the first place.
Wash your hands...shakes head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2012, 11:51 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,189,134 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by moving_pains View Post
How nice that the government has decided to use my tax dollars to test the purity of beach sand! Just what this country always wanted. What other altruistic measures can I spend my tax dollars on?
I don't believe they've studied the impact of chipmunk farts on the environment as of yet.

Personally, I'd like to know how many times a worm takes a dump per square foot of soil.

Altruistically...


Mircea

Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Exactly how are you proposing they keep the beach clear.
I would think this would be simple matter of having a federal judge grant an injunction and restraining order against crabs, turtles and sea gulls. No defecating or urinating within 100 miles of a public beach.

I do believe that would be more than sufficient, until such time as the National Institute of Health can have a few dozen more tax-payer funded Jell-O parties and figure out a way to teach crabs and sea gulls to use public toilets. Perhaps that was the whole point of spending money to watch shrimp on treadmills.

Also, given the urgency of the situation, I would recommend that the Obama Administration issue no-bid contracts to Haliburton to build public toilets for crabs and sea gulls, and in the interim, issue a no-bid contract to Academi, formerly Xe, formerly Blackwater, to provide security services and enforce the restraining order against the crabs and sea gulls.

Proposing....


Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2012, 01:38 AM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,028,424 times
Reputation: 5455
Evil Haliburton. That would create quite the dilemma for the moonbats. They would be helping out the poor little crabs and sea gulls and providing a public service to keep the beaches clean but on the other hand they are evil. Hmmmm what to do............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 PM.

ツゥ 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top