Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-12-2012, 10:55 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,351,471 times
Reputation: 7627

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Thank you, so the U6 barely cracked 10% between 2003 and 2004. Completely consistant with the workforce participation rate.
You're welcome.
Note how this "real" UE rate is REALLY stopping to drop off - reflecting the recent surge in hiring. Remember too that THIS includes those who have "given up" looking for work or working part-time when they really want full time work. It's a pretty complete (the most complete available) picture of unemployment and it's DEFINITELY showing an improving labor market.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-12-2012, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,768,423 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Don't think that argument makes much sense.

Ken

How so? The extreme ends of the age spectrum of that older employees were affected differently by the downturn, the older "older" workers being hit harder than the age bracket of workers below them. As the extremes of the brackets moved on, and workers form one bracket moved to the "older" bracket entered with less unemployment than the people they were replacing. You may disagree with the articles conclusion, but it makes perfect sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 11:02 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,351,471 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
How so? The extreme ends of the age spectrum of that older employees were affected differently by the downturn, the older "older" workers being hit harder than the age bracket of workers below them. As the extremes of the brackets moved on, and workers form one bracket moved to the "older" bracket entered with less unemployment than the people they were replacing. You may disagree with the articles conclusion, but it makes perfect sense.
Ok, I see what you are saying (misunderstood your earlier post). Could have an impact. As the U-6 numbers show however, there is definitely some major improvement going in the labor markets. We are NOT "healthy" yet - but DEFINITELY moving in the right direction - and apparently at an excelerating pace. As I've mentioned earlier - the UE rate is NEARLY where it was when Bush left office. Now, having said, that, that was STILL a very high rate. The good news now though is that - rather in INCREASING, that rate is now DECREASING.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 11:32 AM
 
994 posts, read 725,692 times
Reputation: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Ok, I see what you are saying (misunderstood your earlier post). Could have an impact. As the U-6 numbers show however, there is definitely some major improvement going in the labor markets. We are NOT "healthy" yet - but DEFINITELY moving in the right direction - and apparently at an excelerating pace. As I've mentioned earlier - the UE rate is NEARLY where it was when Bush left office. Now, having said, that, that was STILL a very high rate. The good news now though is that - rather in INCREASING, that rate is now DECREASING.

Ken
The question now is whether people will be smart enough to realize that it is improving despite Obama's policies rather than because of them. If Obama hadn't created such havoc with the business climate, there would've been more confidence in the economy and more hiring and investment 2 years ago instead of us just starting to see the light of day now. It was, in fact, the election of the "obstructionist" Republicans that restored some sanity to the government and started things on a more positive direction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,842,852 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kkaos2 View Post
The question now is whether people will be smart enough to realize that it is improving despite Obama's policies rather than because of them.
Your bitterness and hatred towards Obama aside, it appears you're finally catching up to those smart people who realize that economy is improving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,768,423 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Your bitterness and hatred towards Obama aside, it appears you're finally catching up to those smart people who realize that economy is improving.
People realize that the employment recovery, such that it is, is anemic and the gains are offset by economic difficulties such as fuel prices. This is reflected in the polls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 11:46 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,351,471 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kkaos2 View Post
The question now is whether people will be smart enough to realize that it is improving despite Obama's policies rather than because of them. If Obama hadn't created such havoc with the business climate, there would've been more confidence in the economy and more hiring and investment 2 years ago instead of us just starting to see the light of day now. It was, in fact, the election of the "obstructionist" Republicans that restored some sanity to the government and started things on a more positive direction.
Unfortunately for you there is no real correlation between WHEN the UE rate started to drop and WHEN the GOP took over the House. The fact is the rate had already dropped before the GOP got the House - and in fact in the months following the GOP takeover of the House the UE rate when BACK UP and only started dropping again in the fall so good luck with that argument.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,842,852 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
People realize that the employment recovery, such that it is, is anemic and the gains are offset by economic difficulties such as fuel prices. This is reflected in the polls.
Sounds like you're also recognizing employment recovery. Welcome to the realities.

As for gas prices, yes, they are likely to hurt. However, if we're still marching on, it would only prove that employment recovery would be better if not for higher prices?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,768,423 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Sounds like you're also recognizing employment recovery. Welcome to the realities.

As for gas prices, yes, they are likely to hurt. However, if we're still marching on, it would only prove that employment recovery would be better if not for higher prices?
Lol, when did I deny it? When are you going to recognize it is anemic?

Or if not for greater employment, greater GDP, greater trade balance, etc., you get the picture, well maybe not you, but others. The economy is in the tank and kept there by the policies of this administration?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2012, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,842,852 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Lol, when did I deny it? When are you going to recognize it is anemic?

Or if not for greater employment, greater GDP, greater trade balance, etc., you get the picture, well maybe not you, but others. The economy is in the tank and kept there by the policies of this administration?
Sure, we would all love to see 4% unemployment rate that we did in 2000-2001... but let us not forget the disaster of a decade that the 2000s had been. As for trade imbalance, how exactly do we go about fixing that in a short time? What do you consider to be a logical time frame for all that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top