Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-17-2012, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,338,017 times
Reputation: 2250

Advertisements

Obama's lies continue to mount. The latest batch are found in his energy speech this week. He has got to go.

Even though higher gasoline prices were a stated goal, Obama is not to blame. | Wizbang
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-17-2012, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Sarasota FL
6,864 posts, read 12,083,605 times
Reputation: 6744
While Obama was giving his speech to the college students, he neglected to finish his statement of 'we are drilling more today that ever' with 'because of drilling on private and state land with permits granted during the Bush Administration'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2012, 11:59 AM
 
5,036 posts, read 5,139,768 times
Reputation: 2356
We still are not doing enough to find and use our own resources. This clown continues to mock those who use common sense. You're damn right Drill Baby Drill. Stupid arrogant clown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2012, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,338,017 times
Reputation: 2250
Even the wacko libs on this site have nothing to say about these lies!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2012, 04:28 PM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,497,657 times
Reputation: 3510
I think that people who've educated themselves about the energy policy of our government, and private industry, understand that the President's efforts have been successful ... even given the obstructionism of an extremist House of Representatives. The GOP seems to want to transfer our wealth to the Saudi's and other Middle East nations instead of working towards greater national security and expansion of renewable energy sources. The GOP candidates are wolves in sheeps clothing. Not to be trusted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2012, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Cape Coral
5,503 posts, read 7,338,017 times
Reputation: 2250
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
I think that people who've educated themselves about the energy policy of our government, and private industry, understand that the President's efforts have been successful ... even given the obstructionism of an extremist House of Representatives. The GOP seems to want to transfer our wealth to the Saudi's and other Middle East nations instead of working towards greater national security and expansion of renewable energy sources. The GOP candidates are wolves in sheeps clothing. Not to be trusted.
Developing our nations oil, gas, coal and nuclear energy is the way to become independent from the terrorist oil nations of the middle east. Alternative energy and conservation can only make a small impact for the foreseeable future. Obama panders to his treehugger base at the expense of what is best for the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2012, 08:14 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,074,696 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
The GOP seems to want to transfer our wealth to the Saudi's and other Middle East nations instead of working towards greater national security and expansion of renewable energy sources.
The renewable energy resources the government is focused on are solar and wind which produce electric and has nothing to do with oil, the day of electric cars being predominant are far off in the future if ever. At the very least you'll have transitory period of a few decades where they are powered by liquid fuels from coal, liquid fuel from oil shale, CNG or bio fuels like that derived from algae all of which can be produced domestically with enormous supplies. 100% electric cars have a niche but it's very small niche.

This electric power derived from renewable energy resources is very expensive that relies on huge government subsidies to be competitive. We have both enormous quantities of coal and natural gas which can be used to produce electric. It's unnecessary to push this tech through before it's competitive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2012, 08:19 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,571,410 times
Reputation: 6324
Quote:
Originally Posted by rikoshaprl View Post
Developing our nations oil, gas, coal and nuclear energy is the way to become independent from the terrorist oil nations of the middle east. Alternative energy and conservation can only make a small impact for the foreseeable future. Obama panders to his treehugger base at the expense of what is best for the country.
That's because a lot of treehuggers are not liberals. They are a cross section of Americans of all political beliefs, races and creeds that Republiacns have chosen to pigeonhole as a bunch of insane loonies just because they believe that the environment should be a priority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2012, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,753,051 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
I think that people who've educated themselves about the energy policy of our government, and private industry, understand that the President's efforts have been successful ... .

Now that's really funny. You have lowered the bar lower than a frogs ass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2012, 09:02 PM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,497,657 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
The renewable energy resources the government is focused on are solar and wind which produce electric and has nothing to do with oil, the day of electric cars being predominant are far off in the future if ever. At the very least you'll have transitory period of a few decades where they are powered by liquid fuels from coal, liquid fuel from oil shale, CNG or bio fuels like that derived from algae all of which can be produced domestically with enormous supplies. 100% electric cars have a niche but it's very small niche.

This electric power derived from renewable energy resources is very expensive that relies on huge government subsidies to be competitive. We have both enormous quantities of coal and natural gas which can be used to produce electric. It's unnecessary to push this tech through before it's competitive.
I sense you don't know what the discussion is about. Pay attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top