Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I congratulate Sarah Palin on being able to list many of the real, current ails of our political and economical system while addressing Obama in the same letter, therefore implicitly implying that in this case, correlation equals causation (i.e. Obama is to blame for everything wrong with our economy). She didn't even have to address the causes of any of the issues, or site any facts to support her statements.
Well done Mrs. Palin. Given that both parties support the interest of Wall Street who truly controls the economy, and that voting either Republican or Democrat will only influence women's rights at this point, I would definitely have voted for you if you ran for President.
The quitter had to do something to deflect the impact of that biographical movie that premiered on Saturday night. Then again, it didn't tell anyone with any intellect something he or she didn't already know.
"if that includes the opportunity to debate him on the issues"
Even Sarah Palin's not dumb enough to do that. He'd eat her lunch in a debate.
Yes, he would. It's easy to be great at campaigning when you feel no obligation to ahere to truth or reality. He's going to have that advantage over any of the Republicans. They simply cannot play at his level of dishonesty because the media will call them out on it, whereas they do not call out Obama.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,087,778 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas
Only to their sheep, the rest of the world knows a snakeoil salesperson when they see em.
yep!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kkaos2
Yes, he would. It's easy to be great at campaigning when you feel no obligation to ahere to truth or reality. He's going to have that advantage over any of the Republicans. They simply cannot play at his level of dishonesty because the media will call them out on it, whereas they do not call out Obama.
I hope you are trying to be funny,if not then pathetic...honesty and Republican should never be used in the same sentence...how quick your kind forgets Karl Rove who is on Satan's speed dial,Bush lying every time his lips moved and that lying talking crap stain Reagan...your lack of honesty with that post is typical.
Yes, he would. It's easy to be great at campaigning when you feel no obligation to ahere to truth or reality. He's going to have that advantage over any of the Republicans. They simply cannot play at his level of dishonesty because the media will call them out on it, whereas they do not call out Obama.
I agree with everything she said. In fact, I believe deep down liberals also agree with her. What's not to agree with? Everything she said is right there in plain sight for all to see.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.