Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Who should be able to refuse to marry same-sex couples?
Religious ministers (priests, pastors, rabbis, etc.) 77 86.52%
Individual judges 26 29.21%
Individual ministers-of-peace 31 34.83%
Entire companies devoted to marrying couples 29 32.58%
Entire counties 22 24.72%
Nobody 13 14.61%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-22-2012, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA
7,639 posts, read 18,137,801 times
Reputation: 6914

Advertisements

Regardless of your views on whether same-sex "marriage" should be legal or not, if a law passes granting same-sex couples the right to marry, who should be able to refuse to perform such marriages based on their moral objections?

The answers are in the poll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2012, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,227,954 times
Reputation: 9895
Churches, because of the 1st amendment. All others are offering a for pay service, and can not discriminate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 05:49 PM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,362,435 times
Reputation: 12713
Default Who should be able to refuse to marry same-sex couples?

Anyone who feels it is against their beliefs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,860,190 times
Reputation: 3315
Anyone except any person who is paid by the state to perform the duty, if gay marriage is legal in a state then a state employee shouldn't be able to refuse performing that service for them since it's a legal matter and not a religious matter. Nobody is being forced to attend a religious ceremony but if a gay couple comes to a justice of the peace or any gov. office for a marriage cert. then whoever is working there should be force to provide them that service or they should be fired.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,050,893 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Churches, because of the 1st amendment. All others are offering a for pay service, and can not discriminate.
This, bar none.

There are no logical arguments against it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 06:16 PM
 
1,595 posts, read 2,765,968 times
Reputation: 849
I voted the first and 3 I wasn't sure but picked it but still not a 100% sure I should have based on my belief/feelings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 06:22 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,909,461 times
Reputation: 11259
I do not believe any non-governmental body should be forced to marry anyone. My answer is everybody except government officials.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 06:24 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,227,954 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
I do not believe any non-governmental body should be forced to marry anyone. My answer is everybody except government officials.
Then do you agree that any non government official has the right to deny services to anyone based on their personal beliefs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 06:26 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,909,461 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Then do you agree that any non government official has the right to deny services to anyone based on their personal beliefs?
Yes. With the exception of emergency medical services.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 06:32 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,227,954 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Yes. With the exception of emergency medical services.
At least you're consistent.

I think it would be a very bad idea. Some races wouldn't be allowed to eat with others in some restaurants. Some religions wouldn't be excluded from some stores.... Not a good precedent to start.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top