Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2012, 12:51 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,706,970 times
Reputation: 14818

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
This is a good ruling - I have often wanted to work through my lunch break - and became irritated when my supervisors would be demanding that I leave my workstation: and that is really all that the break amounts to for many people - moving from one place to another for a duration of time. How I use that time should be my business - and if I choose to be productive with the lunch period - and my employer is happy - they should not have to be monitoring what I do during that period simply so they don't run the risk of being sued.

The OP mistitled the thread. Employers are still required to provide a lunch break period. The difference is that employees are now allowed to use those periods in whichever manner they wish. This is a victory for people who understand that the workforce is comprised of adults and that we don't need to be babysat - we are capable of making decisions on our own!

Why anyone would be critical of this outcome is beyond me.

Agreed. I think that it is a good ruling
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2012, 12:54 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,568,283 times
Reputation: 6324
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Agreed. I think that it is a good ruling
Obviously it is.

If Renault thinks it's bad, no doubt that it is good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2012, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,477,038 times
Reputation: 10343
Lunchtime is naptime...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2012, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,013,345 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
Lunchtime is naptime...
For some.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2012, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,742,275 times
Reputation: 38639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nayabone View Post
Those employees that you think are insane for working through lunch will be the ones that succeed and will one day be your boss...!
You are correct though. Employees still get lunch break, but the way it is now, if some work through lunch, the government can fine the company. If you work for a large nation wide company, they can fine you, not for the one dude who worked through lunch, but by the total number of employees the company has nation wide. So if you company has thousands of employees and one of them works through lunch, your fine amount is based on the fact you have thousands of employees. Large companies are nailed to the wall for one guy who is trying to catch up on his work. The new law was necessary.
Funny, I've been able to complete my work AND take a break AND extra projects all at the same time. Guess they won't be my boss one day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2012, 01:08 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Renault, how does this ruling affect your life?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2012, 01:10 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,315 posts, read 47,056,299 times
Reputation: 34085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nayabone View Post
Those employees that you think are insane for working through lunch will be the ones that succeed and will one day be your boss...!
You are correct though. Employees still get lunch break, but the way it is now, if some work through lunch, the government can fine the company. If you work for a large nation wide company, they can fine you, not for the one dude who worked through lunch, but by the total number of employees the company has nation wide. So if you company has thousands of employees and one of them works through lunch, your fine amount is based on the fact you have thousands of employees. Large companies are nailed to the wall for one guy who is trying to catch up on his work. The new law was necessary.
Working hard is not necessarily working smart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top