Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:12 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,048,770 times
Reputation: 15038

Advertisements

I'm still searching for the this phantom Obama that Republicans have invented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:16 PM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,493,925 times
Reputation: 3510
"Who is this guy pretending to be president?"

I thought you were going to speak of President "W" Bush.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:18 PM
 
3,045 posts, read 3,193,246 times
Reputation: 1307
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
This is a GREAT read.
A poorly written one-sided editorial on an online webpage is far from a great read. He uses acronyms that aren't even correct. For instance, "WTH did that Obama go?". WTH could mean who the hell, what the hell or why the hell. To boot, why even use that when you're an adult writing an editorial. Perhaps, the next time he could end with WTF, LOLz, Obama, whatevs.

Everything put forward in the writing is pure opinion with nothing to back it up. There's no data showing how he intimidated the supreme court. Lawyers and politicians normally comment on cases in a public forum.

The author also states an outright lie. "But if only we borrowed and spent a trillion dollars, unemployment would stay beneath 8%, Obama promised." Obama never promised that anything would stay under 8%.

In the end, this is one poorly written, poorly argued opinion peace done by an emotional partisan who can't back up his opinions and it's being championed by the same.

I really wish there were any conservatives on here who actually went to college and could make a strong, reasoned argument about, well, anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,833,234 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by noexcuseforignorance View Post
A poorly written one-sided editorial on an online webpage is far from a great read. He uses acronyms that aren't even correct. For instance, "WTH did that Obama go?". WTH could mean who the hell, what the hell or why the hell. To boot, why even use that when you're an adult writing an editorial. Perhaps, the next time he could end with WTF, LOLz, Obama, whatevs.

Everything put forward in the writing is pure opinion with nothing to back it up. There's no data showing how he intimidated the supreme court. Lawyers and politicians normally comment on cases in a public forum.

The author also states an outright lie. "But if only we borrowed and spent a trillion dollars, unemployment would stay beneath 8%, Obama promised." Obama never promised that anything would stay under 8%.

In the end, this is one poorly written, poorly argued opinion peace done by an emotional partisan who can't back up his opinions and it's being championed by the same.

I really wish there were any conservatives on here who actually went to college and could make a strong, reasoned argument about, well, anything.
Noexcuseforignorance...... "Where" ...keyword was "go". Although, normally it's "What the hell." And "that" Obama would be referring to him as an object, vs. say, a person. I think they meant it to be demeaning. To reduce him from a man to say, a toaster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:54 PM
 
3,045 posts, read 3,193,246 times
Reputation: 1307
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall_Rep View Post
Just vote for obama...clearly you aren't intelligent enough to make an informed decision. All you seem able to do is reguritate democrat gtalking points, and you seem perfectly comfortable to vote once again for complete and total failure.
The last time I checked, I caught you here blaming Obama for the TARP bill that was actually signed into law by Bush. You're trying to knock someone for being stupid when you've shown yourself on here for having no idea of the facts.

Thankfully, there are people like me around here to follow your posts and call you out on this on a consistent basis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
But...the Left loves this obama.
And the insane hate him. Hence such "articles".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 02:01 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,452,677 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
And the insane hate him. Hence such "articles".
No, it's more like the insane LOVE HIM! You have to be totally nuts to believe anything this liar says and a complete insane fool to trust him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,282,339 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by highcotton View Post
Anyone is better than a radical, lying, fraud, scumbag communist like clown Obozo.
You might want to look up the definitions of the words you use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
No, it's more like the insane LOVE HIM! You have to be totally nuts to believe anything this liar says and a complete insane fool to trust him.
Coming from someone who is obligated to hate him, I'd say he has done enough for what he promised. After all, isn't that why y'all are upset and have been suffering with diarrhea since his election?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2012, 12:10 AM
 
Location: County Mayo Descendant
2,725 posts, read 5,980,804 times
Reputation: 1217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall_Rep View Post
you hear PLENTY else.....real solutions for REAL problems. You're too busy listening to obama to hear anything else.

Example...when is the last time the democrats put forth a BUDGET? The republicans have. The democrats just fly by the seat of their pants....the president asks for debt limit increases at every new session of congress.

Just vote for obama...clearly you aren't intelligent enough to make an informed decision. All you seem able to do is reguritate democrat gtalking points, and you seem perfectly comfortable to vote once again for complete and total failure.
You mean Ryan's budget and what he was hiding in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top