Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-25-2012, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,936,147 times
Reputation: 16587

Advertisements

A rather large pool of people who fully support the efforts to recall Walker.

Put Wisconsin First : Sex Offenders For Recall
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-25-2012, 05:17 PM
 
3,064 posts, read 2,638,810 times
Reputation: 968
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
A rather large pool of people who fully support the efforts to recall Walker.

Put Wisconsin First : Sex Offenders For Recall
Looks like there's at least 200 - 300 names/photos on that list! Nice crowd supporting the recall of Walker! Makes you wonder what good things Walker is doing to protect children that these perverts don't like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2012, 05:55 PM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,205,160 times
Reputation: 3411
Since the recall campaign turned in around a million signatures, I'm surprised that they didn't find way more, because on a percentage basis there's a whole lot more sex offenders in the general population than reflected here...

This has to be one of the all time DUMB threads I've ever seen. If this is your best argument in support of Walker, there's really nothing else to say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2012, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,554,229 times
Reputation: 18814
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
Since the recall campaign turned in around a million signatures, I'm surprised that they didn't find way more, because on a percentage basis there's a whole lot more sex offenders in the general population than reflected here...

This has to be one of the all time DUMB threads I've ever seen. If this is your best argument in support of Walker, there's really nothing else to say.
Its all they got since they know his policies aren't worth standing on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2012, 06:55 PM
 
3,064 posts, read 2,638,810 times
Reputation: 968
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
Since the recall campaign turned in around a million signatures, I'm surprised that they didn't find way more, because on a percentage basis there's a whole lot more sex offenders in the general population than reflected here...

This has to be one of the all time DUMB threads I've ever seen. If this is your best argument in support of Walker, there's really nothing else to say.
But we all know that most of the other signature spaces were filled with Mickey Mouse and Bozo T. Clown.

BTW, Scott Walker is a really great guy and the best thing that ever happened to Wisconsin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2012, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,214,794 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
Since the recall campaign turned in around a million signatures, I'm surprised that they didn't find way more, because on a percentage basis there's a whole lot more sex offenders in the general population than reflected here...

This has to be one of the all time DUMB threads I've ever seen. If this is your best argument in support of Walker, there's really nothing else to say.
Yeah, it's almost a waste of thought to reply to the thread, being so DUMB and all.

But then, why would any sex offender want to recall Walker? Maybe a union worker, or a school teacher or hospital worker? Maybe that's all the argument necessary to support Walker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2012, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
Since the recall campaign turned in around a million signatures, I'm surprised that they didn't find way more, because on a percentage basis there's a whole lot more sex offenders in the general population than reflected here...

This has to be one of the all time DUMB threads I've ever seen. If this is your best argument in support of Walker, there's really nothing else to say.
Exactly right. The fact that there were 200-300 sex offenders on a million name recall petition doesn't discredit the recall.

I'm sure there were wife beaters and perverts on the list too. So what?

The fact that the Walker apologists use this information as a vane attempt to discredit the recall effort shows how weak a real case they have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2012, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by tofurkey View Post
Yeah, it's almost a waste of thought to reply to the thread, being so DUMB and all.

But then, why would any sex offender want to recall Walker? Maybe a union worker, or a school teacher or hospital worker? Maybe that's all the argument necessary to support Walker.
Most people categorized as "sex offender" are there because they were convicted of statutory rape -- like a 25 yo male having sex with his 16 y.o. girlfriend. That doesn't mean this person doesn't have a legitimate desire to rid a crony of the Koch brothers running the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2012, 07:11 PM
 
1,182 posts, read 1,139,822 times
Reputation: 439
I thought only voters could sign the recall. Maybe they do things differently there. But perverts cannot vote because they are convicted felons and have lost that right and since lots of polling places are in schools, which they are not allowed within 1000 feet of, they could not vote anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2012, 07:12 PM
 
1,182 posts, read 1,139,822 times
Reputation: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Most people categorized as "sex offender" are there because they were convicted of statutory rape -- like a 25 yo male having sex with his 16 y.o. girlfriend. That doesn't mean this person doesn't have a legitimate desire to rid a crony of the Koch brothers running the state.
A 25 year old and a 16 year old he is a pervert and should be hung in public. A 19 year old and a 16 year old, maybe not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top