Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-27-2012, 11:28 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,975,057 times
Reputation: 12829

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Bach View Post
BP Oil...when they dumped billions of gallons of crude into the Gulf Of Mexico via the big leak....did not clean up the oil..They just swept it under the carpet..The use chemicals to sink the oil and the stupid idea that bacteria naturally break up and destroy crude oil is lunacy.

Out of sight and out of mind don't cut it. This poison is still in the gulf and tiny bits of it will be absorbed by sea life....They should have taken the time to clean up every drop while it was floating..but they took the cheap way out...
IIRC, Obama said he wouldn't rest until the spill was cleaned up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2012, 03:28 AM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,942,403 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
IIRC, Obama said he wouldn't rest until the spill was cleaned up.
What spill? Do you see a spill?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,576,981 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDusr View Post
What spill? Do you see a spill?
Look Mom, no more oil !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 10:41 AM
 
Location: planet octupulous is nearing earths atmosphere
13,621 posts, read 12,744,537 times
Reputation: 20050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
Premature conclusion based on speculation of anecdotal information.
Maybe be something to to it maybe not.

I'd look at precedent and ask where other spills occurred and what happened to the local fisheries. Haven't heard of deformities associated with other oil spills. So why would this spill be different?

Don't forget the big flood a few years ago that washed God knows what into the Gulf. How do you differentiate deformities due to different sources? I'm sure it can be done and will be done but early associations with the oil spill may be hysterical.

the difference is that the bp oil leak was ten time worse than the others. and they sprayed 2 million gallons of corexit to sink the oil
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,576,981 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by cruxan View Post
the difference is that the bp oil leak was ten time worse than the others. and they sprayed 2 million gallons of corexit to sink the oil
And with the answer right in front of their faces (oil + heavy chemicals) they are "dumbfounded" as to what is causing this ???????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,731,619 times
Reputation: 14818
It's only the beginning. I suspect that we'll be hearing about all sorts of negative consequences for years to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,208,846 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
They are coming, how dangerous? We don't know yet, but studies are going on and reports will come out ... here's one

Tar patches, deformed fish: Gulf shows signs of damage two years after oil spill - CBS News
Sounds great, giant jumbo shrimp.

http://haddrellspoint.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/giant-asian-tiger-shrimp.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 12:09 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,466,884 times
Reputation: 14266
Hush and eat your deformed, oily shrimp, you eco-hippies!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 09:42 PM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,942,403 times
Reputation: 1119
Earthfiles.com Environment | Part 1: Gulf Fishermen Finding Sick Fish, Few Crabs and Shrimp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2012, 05:50 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,208,846 times
Reputation: 1378
Op, when were YOU planning to post the correction and correct the title if this thread?

Quote:
CORRECTION: On April 21, ABC affiliate WEAR-TV, which covers Pensacola, Moblie and Fort Walton, reported on its website that some areas of the Gulf were being closed on the morning of April 23 due to concerns over the presence of smaller-than-normal shrimp and shrimp with “lesions.” That report was in line with a multitude of other recent mainstream media reports – from the Associated Press, Al Jazeera and others (see links to articles at bottom) – of severely deformed seafood coming out of the Gulf of Mexico. The deformities –confirmed by local fishermen, seafood processors and scientists alike – include shrimp with no eyes, shrimp with tumors, red snapper and grouper with deep lesions and underdeveloped blue crabs without claws (see video below).

We picked up the WEAR-TV report and published an April 23 post entitled, “Looming Crisis: Officials Close Gulf Waters to Shrimping as Reports of Deformed Seafood Intensify.” Unfortunately, the WEAR-TV report turned out to be incorrect. The ABC affiliate has pulled the initial report and replaced it with this correction dated April 25:

Alabama – The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources has temporarily closed some local waterways to shrimping. The waters were closed to shrimping on Monday.

The areas include all waters in the Mississippi Sound, Mobile Bay, areas of Bon Secour, Wolf Bay, and Little Lagoon.

The closure is in response to routine shrimp sampling that indicated the average size were smaller than 68 head-on shrimp per pound. Meaning biologists found smaller than average shrimp in the waters causing the temporary closure. They will continue to take samples in these areas and determine any modifications to the closures.

And we’d like to clarify that the closures were not due to lesions being found on shrimp as we reported earlier this weekend and Monday morning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top