Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Folks here will argue to the death that if we just follow the advice of Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh, we do not need scientists, who are all closet communists anyway. The invisible hand will solve all these problems. They need no one. They have it all figured out. So long as we have economic growth and financial liberty, all is well. The wealthy will fund our science. They have only the best of humanity and all those other species in mind at all times.
The fact that people have driven hundreds of species extinct and continue to do so every day doesn't matter. Those are all lies made up by America-hating liberals,anyway. They read it on their favorite blog. Welcome to the 21st Century.
"The authors of the Nature review – biologists, ecologists, complex-systems theoreticians, geologists and paleontologists from the United States, Canada, South America and Europe – argue that, although many warning signs are emerging, no one knows how close Earth is to a global tipping point, or if it is inevitable."
So they are basically saying your guess is as good as mine. Good thing the folks at Bezerkly have something to do other than take LSD and play the bongos on the street corner nowdays at least.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to determine that we don't need more people on this earth.
And don't worry about extinct species. If you believe in evolution, they will come back and be better adaptive to the new world.
Ok, but are you saying we don't need scientists? That is what I usually read. Scientists around the world are overwhelmingly liberal. How do you feel about that?
Apparrently not these scientists because after all their research or whatever they want to call it they have come up with the answer I posted above. Yippee.
Ok, but are you saying we don't need scientists? That is what I usually read. Scientists around the world are overwhelmingly liberal. How do you feel about that?
We do need scientists.
We don't need scientists studying useless stuff like what happened 200 million years ago or trying to guess what will happen 100 years in the future. Those guesses are useless.
Don't worry, there isn't enough blacktop to coat the whole planet, they'll leave some insecticide coated "green zones" for us to play in.
Serious for a moment, if they don't do something soon we are going to lose our honey bees. My buddy has lost three batches to this hive collapse syndrome. Maybe the canary in the coal mine???
However, is this the same thing that caused a Florida airport to changed the heading of run ways?
It happens....
Keep that head in the sand...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
