Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should states' rights be abolished??
Yes 14 11.57%
No 107 88.43%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:06 PM
 
4,574 posts, read 7,503,609 times
Reputation: 2613

Advertisements

Should states' rights be abolished??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Inland Levy County, FL
8,806 posts, read 6,114,806 times
Reputation: 2949
Why would they be?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,772,368 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by nature's message View Post
Should states' rights be abolished??
States don't have rights. People have rights. Of all the governmental units that are useless, state governments top the list. The important things are handled at the Federal level. The rest should be left to cities and counties to deal with. State government is mostly a useless and corrupt cesspool. I don't trust them with ANY decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:27 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,060,276 times
Reputation: 10270
Is that you Barry?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:33 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,984,135 times
Reputation: 4555
Well if I was a benevolent dictator I would abolish the State system...lol

You can't achieve economies of scale, you get States competing against one another to see who can lower middle class benefits the most in bidding wars for corporate relocations. You could reduce administrative costs, pool resources, etc.

France, Scandanvian countries, Japan have a very strong central government (unitary) and weak local governments...they seem to have done very well.

Last edited by padcrasher; 11-18-2010 at 05:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:45 PM
 
716 posts, read 1,120,087 times
Reputation: 337
No. For example, Montana has high speed limits and lax gun laws. That works fine there, it might not work as well in New Jersey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,706,964 times
Reputation: 9980
When ever someone wants rights for a state it usually means they want to deprive someone of their rights as an American Citizen. We have already had one Civil War over this
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,772,368 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatwoods View Post
No. For example, Montana has high speed limits and lax gun laws. That works fine there, it might not work as well in New Jersey.
Speed limits are a matter for the Federal Government to set on interstate highways. On local highways and roads, they should be set by the local city and county officials.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:56 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,065,499 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
States don't have rights.
States certainly do have rights and I see no reason to curtail them.

(of course this will lead to a interminable argument about what rights have or don't have).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,218,878 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by nature's message View Post
Should states' rights be abolished??
Quote:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
You mean dissolve the Union? Sure, why not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top