Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-27-2012, 08:19 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,140,421 times
Reputation: 3368

Advertisements

These guys are at it again...

Quote:
The Texas Republican Party has released its official platform for 2012, and the repeal of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 is one of its central planks.

"We urge that the Voter Rights Act of 1965 codified and updated in 1973 be repealed and not reauthorized," the platform reads.

Under a provision of the Voting Rights Act, certain jurisdictions must obtain permission from the federal government -- called "preclearance" -- before they change their voting rules. The rule was put in place in jurisdictions with a history of voter disenfranchisement.

Some elected officials, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, have since argued that the rules put an unfair burden on certain places and not others. Texas is one of nine states that must obtain preclearance before changing its electoral guidelines.
Texas Republican Party Platform Calls For Repeal Of Voting Rights Act Of 1965
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-27-2012, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,016 posts, read 12,589,326 times
Reputation: 9030
It's like when you are a convicted criminal. You lose trust and have to be watched very carefully.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 10:35 PM
 
Location: Missouri
4,272 posts, read 3,791,311 times
Reputation: 1937
I believe this has always been a part of the Texas GOP platform because part of the law applies to some areas of the country and not to others. The Act shouldn't be repealed, but the preclearance portion of it should be revisited.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 10:46 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,169,371 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
These guys are at it again...
Tell me why you think Texas should have special guidelines that 41 other states dont have? validate to me that you know what you're talking about, rather than just repeating a Huffington POS piece.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 10:52 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,799,673 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
These guys are at it again...
You never fail to amaze. You must have taken a speed reading course, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,876 posts, read 26,546,256 times
Reputation: 25779
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
Honestly, the portion of the voting rights act they are questioning is highly discriminatory and should be repealed. Why are some states and jurrisdictions allowed to require such things as ID to vote, while others are prevented from doing so by the federal government? There might have been some faint justification for it 50 years ago, but not today. Of course, today it is not about voting rights, it is about abuse of the electorial process to ensure that inelligable people manage to vote in some places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 11:02 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,097,922 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Honestly, the portion of the voting rights act they are questioning is highly discriminatory and should be repealed. Why are some states and jurrisdictions allowed to require such things as ID to vote, while others are prevented from doing so by the federal government? There might have been some faint justification for it 50 years ago, but not today. Of course, today it is not about voting rights, it is about abuse of the electorial process to ensure that inelligable people manage to vote in some places.
Exactly they passed voter ID here in PA and since it's already been decided by the Supreme Court it's constitutional there is nothing the DOJ can do about it....... yet in Texas they are being sued by the DOJ for the same law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 11:05 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
 
n/a posts
Seems like standard Texas GOP insanity to me. It's just the usual hate-filled, anti-American, anti-freedom diatribe they've been spewing for years.

As for why certain states have to get preclearance? Well, that's what happens when you continually try to deny minorities the right to vote, then get drug into court, lose, and come up with some new scheme to deny voting rights, then go back to court, lose again, then come up with yet another scheme to deny voting rights...

Don't like it? Don't try to stop legitimate voters from casting ballots.

Fortunately, we don't have to worry about this going away anytime soon. SCOTUS already ruled 8-1 in support of preclearance (in 2009) and Bush renewed the provision in 2006, good for the next 25 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 11:08 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,097,922 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonF View Post
SCOTUS already ruled 8-1 in support of preclearance (in 2009) and Bush renewed the provision in 2006, good for the next 25 years.
They also ruled in favor of Voter ID so why is the DOJ using the Voting rights Act to prevent them from carrying it out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 11:57 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,685,599 times
Reputation: 18521
It would not be an issue, if it applied to all states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top