Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
it never quotes alexandra hill as stating obama's birth certificate is a forgery and counter attorney mario apuzzo has stated he never heard her make any such statement.
your link is confusing hill's argument that the birth certificate isn't relevent to the case (which the judge agreed) with her stating it is fradulent.
it never quotes alexandra hill as stating obama's birth certificate is a forgery and counter attorney mario apuzzo has stated he never heard her make any such statement.
And since the entire video of the hearing is on line, that can also be verified by anybody who simply bothers to go watch it.
Obama Lawyer Admits Birth Certificate Is A Forgery
"Ms. Hill then said that the PDF document was irrelevant to the case at hand, and conceded that Obama never once gave his birth certificate, or any good copy of it, hard or soft, to the New Jersey Secretary of State or the Division of Elections. Hill then claimed that New Jersey law did not force Obama to give anything to qualify himself for a primary ballot, and that New Jersey residents could nominate Mickey Mouse if they could get enough signatures to nominate him.
The Tea Party Tribune, and other media organs quoting them, construed this as saying that Alexandra Hill “admitted that the Obama birth certificate is a forgery.” That is not correct. "
Yep, it seems that just yesterday Joe Arpaio came up with some new news about the Birth Certificate. I am sure that many here won't want to see his latest. The best part of it is that he has nobody in government to give his new news to since that all answer directly to the number one man, Eric Holder, who answers directly to The One.
Sheriff Joe has no legs. He has no authority to investigate the matter; and all of his "evidence" is irrelevant and inadmissable and not proof of anything. And, he has no standing to challenge President Obama's eligibility in any court. End of story.
We could have an illegal President? Wow, this is truely an important issue. But instead of a full investigation the Demoncrates are more concerned if Romney was still CEO of Bain in 1999. Because if Romney technically was still CEO then technically he could have been charged with a crime. But no need to worry about a real possibility of an illegal Presidential election in 2008.
Are we really suppose to take these Demoncrates seriously? How do we believe a word?
Last edited by All American NYC; 07-18-2012 at 02:33 PM..
The best part of it is that he has nobody in government to give his new news to...
He could behave like a law enforcement professional and hand his evidence to the relevant prosecutors. The only problem with that is that they'd do the rational thing and laugh in his face.
He could behave like a law enforcement professional and hand his evidence to the relevant prosecutors. The only problem with that is that they'd do the rational thing and laugh in his face.
Apparently, that's what happened when they tried to find a real expert in document forensics to work with them. Zullo said in the presser that every single professional they approached told them to go pound sand.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here is the latest in "birther" news.
