Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Funny how science is roundly condemned for "playing God" when, for example, trying to bring back a species from extinction, but blood transfusions? Ventilators? Corneal transplants? Using defibrilators?
For some reasons, those things aren't "playing God". How utterly nonsensical.
Of course, utterly nonsensical spewings are what come with embracing a world-view that makes absolutely no coherent sense whatsoever...
They are also trying to bring back neanderthals. What's the problem?
What's the problem? On the neanderthals specifically where are these people to be kept when they get older if they have an IQ of 60?
As far as the rest go we already have enormous problems with invasive species that exist, do we need to potentially add more to the mix? The Jurassic Park tale is not really what I'm referring too here but insects or even small animals that may have the potential to destroy the food chain.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.