Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-14-2012, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21738

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimar View Post
Did anyone play with this when it was originally published?
It's quite stupid actually.

You can cut the budget and harm the economy, or cut the budget and help the economy (or in the very least create a neutral impact on the economy). This thing doesn't let you do that, and more importantly, it doesn't show you the economic impact of the actions you take. In other words, if you do these things, how many jobs will it cost (or gain) and how will it affect GDP etc etc etc. It's mostly for propaganda purposes.

Budgeting...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2012, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
4,439 posts, read 5,521,009 times
Reputation: 3395
This is a very useful exercise, as it shows how *easy* it is to cut government spending and limit increases in taxes - I came up with 94% reduction in spending, and 6% increase in taxes (mainly from limiting tax reductions for providing health insurance).

If only I could be put in charge for a year or 2, there wouldn't be any budget / deficit problems to speak of by the time I got done with the budgetary chainsaw...lol.

It's simple math folks: Take what you've got coming in, and limit your spending to that amount. That's it. It really is that simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 07:50 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,222,200 times
Reputation: 35014
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorthStarDelight View Post
This is a very useful exercise, as it shows how *easy* it is to cut government spending and limit increases in taxes - I came up with 94% reduction in spending, and 6% increase in taxes (mainly from limiting tax reductions for providing health insurance).

If only I could be put in charge for a year or 2, there wouldn't be any budget / deficit problems to speak of by the time I got done with the budgetary chainsaw...lol.

It's simple math folks: Take what you've got coming in, and limit your spending to that amount. That's it. It really is that simple.
It is that simple in many ways. Cut the "nice to have" things, the "but we've been doing this since..." things, the "this willl make some industry rich" things, and stick to basics.

I do realize that nothing is really ever that simple though. Too much behind the scenes nonsense and backroom deals and codependency to actually change stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top