Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-08-2012, 09:59 PM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,435,268 times
Reputation: 31495

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Darned few potatoes are grown in Kansas outside a few family gardens and most all the corn that is grown is for livestock feed and ethanol so eating it would be both prohibitive and not very good eating.

Buy your own damn food? Most of the kids in this part of the world do exactly that although there are a few who get the free and reduced prices. The problem is that what is provided is pretty short in amount and kids just aren't used to being forced to get by on why they get at lunch.

Have you ever thought that there is a chance that what brentwood girl said about calories has something to do with what kids need to supply them for the day. Her kid has to get on his bus at 6:25 and that would make eating a very big breakfast a real load. I don't think that leaners, either in DC or here at C-D really understand that one size fits all is pretty stupid reasoning. I doubt that many 120 lb 9th graders need as much as a 200 lb. 9th grader does, but they get the same servings at that place.

Bunch of freeloaders in Kansas. Our schools have supplied school lunches, paid for by the parents, since in the 1940s sometime and you say something like that. Of course, you leaners refuse to understand that since schools do still get excess food from the government it comes with their rules about how much the kids can eat at school. You people try so hard and don't get anything done except among other leaners.
Have you ever explained what a leaner is? You keep using this word, it almost seems as if you want it to be a pejorative taking into account the context of your posts. Will you ever explain what you believe a leaner is? Or should we all just start referring to you as a fatter?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2012, 07:13 AM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,856,553 times
Reputation: 4581
Theres an Obesity crisis in Kansas and most of the Country except the Northeast...so we shouldn't be listening to the Kansas kids...

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 07:38 AM
 
23,978 posts, read 15,086,618 times
Reputation: 12952
I will admit to not watching the new video since I found out that the previous one was written by a teacher.

The ruckus did cause me to look at school lunch programs. First off, my children took their own lunches from home because I considered school lunches to be heavy on fried, salt and sugar. Pizza, fish sticks and tater tots are not my idea of a good lunch.

The schools are provided guidelines. The school district nutritionist planned the menus. If food was being tossed, talk to your school administration.

Every federal program that I am aware of has a process where folks can chime in. Only an idiot would think a 2nd. grader and a high school football player required the same lunch. The school districts could have been letting the department of agriculture know the guidelines were faulty, rather than blindly following them. Any school nutritionists who went along with this nonsense instead of picking up the phone and asking if a mistake had been made or are y'all just crazy, is as guilty as Washington.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 08:04 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savoir Faire View Post
Bunch of freeloaders in Kansas.

Buy your own damn food. Doesn't Kansas have farms and corn or potato fields all over the place?


Pretty sure the parents do pay for their lunch. Only the welfare kids get free lunch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 08:11 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by DontH8Me View Post
In every article I have read about these school lunch grousing fests, they always point out the huge volume of food going into the trash. It is usually the fruits and vegetables. The school where "some" sack lunches were banned, the kids were eating a bag of flaming cheetos washed down with a coke for lunch, that is what precipitated the draconian measure of banning most lunches from home. The school stated that they allowed lunch from home to follow any special diet requirements, so I guess the ban really only applies to the parents who were sending their kids to school with a sack of chips and soda. Not very conducive to learning, I might add.

I think this is more about kids refusing to eat the food they are being served. When my son attended HS, the kids were given options. If he felt like having a burger, he could. If he wanted to have a grilled chicken breast served over mixed greens. No one was forced to eat only one thing.

My son is 6' 3". The school lunch was all he ate in HS. When he came home, he fixed himself a snack before dinner. I understand your daughter being hungry at 4:00 - aren't all teens hungry all afternoon, regardless? I think this school lunch thing is much ado about nothing.


My daughter has a choice, so it doesn't go to waste. It is the portion size that remains the same, for a 1st grader as it is for a 9th grader. Same cost, too. $2.75 is what my cost is for my daughters lunch, daily. Cost is great, but they do get what they pay for and no seconds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 08:17 AM
 
2,083 posts, read 1,621,084 times
Reputation: 1406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
Theres an Obesity crisis in Kansas and most of the Country except the Northeast...so we shouldn't be listening to the Kansas kids...
That map seems to be designed to skew your opinion based on colors rather than the numbers, considering the lowest range goes up to 26.2% and every other darker color is only an extra 1.5% higher, which really makes the map look drastic, when in reality most of the country (sans the South) is separated by only about 3%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,544,683 times
Reputation: 24780
Default Kansas Kids Do It Again

Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
It seems that another small western Kansas school has a very enterprising bunch of kids who have come up with a new video against the new feeding rules from Washington, DC. This may be the best one I have seen although obviously done by amateurs.

You can read what my Congressman thinks about some very serious problems and then you can see why I am very sorry that I live in a part of Kansas that has been moved over to a different voting district. If you don't like things like that go ahead and scroll down to where you can see the video.

Kansas Kids Do It Again


Roy -

It's good to see you supporting the socialism of school lunches for kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 08:25 AM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,408,066 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Pretty sure the parents do pay for their lunch. Only the welfare kids get free lunch.

The program is still subsidized, even if a parent pays "full price" for the lunch, that "full price" (much like college tuition) is lower because the government has contributed funds.



Funny, of course, that anyone talks about SOCIALISM when dealing with PUBLIC SCHOOLS - perhaps the biggest socialist program we have in America. Have any conservative parents even SEEN what a private school education costs, per child? Compare to what you pay in property taxes, then come back whining about SOCIALISM!

Childless people, old people, etc. have to pay into a system to educate kids they don't have, and may never have. Talk about a socialist racket!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
I remember carrying a ham and cheese and a thermos bottle of milk to school when I was in the first grade in 1952. I am still carrying a ham and cheese sandwich to work for lunch in 2012. Some things never change.

I also remember having hot lunches available in High School. Mystery meat (meat loaf), potatoes and some twice boiled beans was one of the better examples. Another fine treat was pasta with tomato sauce and Kraft “parmesan” cheese. That stuff put me off parmesan cheese for decades until I actually tasted some of the real thing.

Most school cooks try to provide a decent lunch but are simply unable to do so given the budgets they have. It is not a job I would ever want to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2012, 08:38 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
The program is still subsidized, even if a parent pays "full price" for the lunch, that "full price" (much like college tuition) is lower because the government has contributed funds.



Funny, of course, that anyone talks about SOCIALISM when dealing with PUBLIC SCHOOLS - perhaps the biggest socialist program we have in America. Have any conservative parents even SEEN what a private school education costs, per child? Compare to what you pay in property taxes, then come back whining about SOCIALISM!

Childless people, old people, etc. have to pay into a system to educate kids they don't have, and may never have. Talk about a socialist racket!

Another failing government program that is under funded?
Make the cost support the program and you may see more sack lunches sent from home and less cost to the districts, who are trying like hell to become the parents of our kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top