Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-19-2012, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,800,075 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. White View Post
This is actually becoming a problem that is not going away. Specifically someone heavily edited the Benghazi talking points but the White House is now denying they did it. So the question remains, who 'specifically' issued the order to edit the CIA report that Susan Rice used on the talk shows?Say Anything White House Claims They Didn't Edit Benghazi Talking Points » Say Anything
Personally I don't care. If they were edited, I am sure there was a reason for it, but to me it really doesn't matter. I think the Congress need to go to work on the Fiscal Cliff and other higher priority issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-19-2012, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,340,817 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. White View Post
This is actually becoming a problem that is not going away. Specifically someone heavily edited the Benghazi talking points but the White House is now denying they did it. So the question remains, who 'specifically' issued the order to edit the CIA report that Susan Rice used on the talk shows?Say Anything White House Claims They Didn't Edit Benghazi Talking Points » Say Anything
ONE WORD was changed.
Try something credible other than blogs and faux.

http://app1.kuhf.org/articles/npr135...rist-Role.html

Don't like this? There are almost 500k additional links.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2012, 11:17 AM
 
2,238 posts, read 1,448,335 times
Reputation: 1272
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
DeadSpeak, there is no dead horse involved in this one. Someone told that woman the "official" story and she repeated it 5 times that morning. Now we need to find out who filled her in and we also need to find out who told those who could have helped to stand down instead of helping. There was a gunship flying around that could have helped, immensely. There were special ops troops in several places that could have been there in much less than the 7 hours the whole thing went on. There were fighters in the air that could have had an effect. Who told them to stand down? I think the orders came from the Situation Room and that is very high uo.

Do you think your cartoon of Star Wars warriors beating on the dead horse deflects anybody but those of your political lean? If so, "nice" job.
what I bolded I will answer as that is the only question I see fit to respond to as the rest is just more nonsense ramblings coming from yourself. The picture I posted has no affect on you or others like yourself simply because you don't care. You are the one's consistently bringing up Benghazi and trying to spin it as some sort of conspiracy theory not the left. Stop pretending like you care that anyone died all you are doing is trying to push and push VERY hard for something to happen because you are angry and bitter that your guy lost. What you and the rest of the republican party should be doing instead of trying to do another 2nd term clinton re-imagining is focus on why your party lost in the first place. But I already know you will do that as again your party simply does not care.

It is funny to me the party that is all about "Taking responsibility" is the same party that blames everyone else for there failings or for their policy failings. GROW UP! And the only other part of your comment or whatever rambling you posted that I will comment about. The whole entire thread the whole topic is about what someone wrote on a blog. A blog is just that A BLOG it does not have to contain any bit of fact, because it is simply a blog. Who was this ladies source ? Do you know this person personally ? If no to either than find a reliable source that will report this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2012, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,710,708 times
Reputation: 9177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Personally I don't care. If they were edited, I am sure there was a reason for it, but to me it really doesn't matter. I think the Congress need to go to work on the Fiscal Cliff and other higher priority issues.
If you gave a crap about the fiscal cliff, you would never have voted for 0bama.

It's his baby, now. All his. He made the mess and now he and his supporters can lie in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2012, 11:28 AM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,080,572 times
Reputation: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. White View Post
This is actually becoming a problem that is not going away. Specifically someone heavily edited the Benghazi talking points but the White House is now denying they did it. So the question remains, who 'specifically' issued the order to edit the CIA report that Susan Rice used on the talk shows?[URL="http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/white-house-claims-they-didnt-edit-benghazi-talking-points/"]Say Anything White House Claims They Didn't Edit Benghazi Talking Points » Say Anything[/URL]
It was edited at the direct direction of Obama. Of that there is no doubt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2012, 11:34 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,282,048 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Let me post the first comment to this blog piece that hasn't been read by any of the left leaners who have responded up to now. I think that even they can't answer to these words without their grandiose deflective attempts.

I'm trying to see where this gets us to the main problem........who told the military to stand down and leave American citizens to die......irregardless if it was a terrorist or a "spontaneous" event.......
Someone in the course of the 7 hrs attack repeatedly told the gunship in the air overhead, told the spec ops teams 2 hrs away, told F15's 45 minutes away to stand down.......


I will never stop wondering who gave the orders to just let those people die without trying to help them live and somebody in the White House gave that order. It is very obvious that Ms. Rice's lies were put to her by someone and surely the White House was involved in getting her set up on those 5 shows.

Petraeus told what seems to be the truth to me and he even talked about the various offices, etc that had to have seen this story before Rice told it the way she was instructed to do.

Who cares who told her the White House story? I want to know who gave the orders that day to allow those men to die. Since the State Department had a drone flying around and sending in its pictures of what was going on it had to be someone involved with the government, and very high up, at that.
How do we have the right/legal right to go into another country with our Aircraft and start shooting at civilians on the ground? How could we even do this without spotters on the ground?
What legal right did we have to do this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2012, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,800,075 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
If you gave a crap about the fiscal cliff, you would never have voted for 0bama.
I didn't vote for him, I wrote in Ron Paul.

Quote:
It's his baby, now. All his. He made the mess and now he and his supporters can lie in it.
That's your view, but the funny part is that you don't even realize that you will lie in it too. I hope the Congress and WH can come to an agreement which is beneficial for the nation. The fiscal cliff was created in a good old bipartisan manner, and I hope it is resolved in the same manner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2012, 02:13 PM
 
114 posts, read 100,763 times
Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
How do we have the right/legal right to go into another country with our Aircraft and start shooting at civilians on the ground? How could we even do this without spotters on the ground?
What legal right did we have to do this?
Because our Consulate there is considered American soil. An attack on it is considered an attack on the United States as a whole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2012, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,838 posts, read 14,972,161 times
Reputation: 16604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. White View Post
This is actually becoming a problem that is not going away. Specifically someone heavily edited the Benghazi talking points but the White House is now denying they did it. So the question remains, who 'specifically' issued the order to edit the CIA report that Susan Rice used on the talk shows?Say Anything White House Claims They Didn't Edit Benghazi Talking Points » Say Anything
Boooosh and Cheney!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2012, 02:43 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,482,652 times
Reputation: 3563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. White View Post
This is actually becoming a problem that is not going away.
It doesn't go away because you keep it alive...
Q - I don't understand the argument around the attack in Benghazi. Can someone explain to people not involved in partisan politics like myself, what is it about? I know the events, but don't get the argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top