Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is actually becoming a problem that is not going away. Specifically someone heavily edited the Benghazi talking points but the White House is now denying they did it. So the question remains, who 'specifically' issued the order to edit the CIA report that Susan Rice used on the talk shows?Say Anything White House Claims They Didn't Edit Benghazi Talking Points » Say Anything
Nobody cares about Benghazi except a few deranged teabaggers who still think Obama's birth certificate is a forgery. This is as much a scandal as Whitewater or Clinton "selling nuke secrets to China!". While conspiracy theories are flying around in wingnut cyberspace and on Faux News, the rest of us are moving on.
Nobody cares about Benghazi except a few deranged teabaggers who still think Obama's birth certificate is a forgery. This is as much a scandal as Whitewater or Clinton "selling nuke secrets to China!". While conspiracy theories are flying around in wingnut cyberspace and on Faux News, the rest of us are moving on.
So who specifically edited the Benghazi talking points?
Nobody cares about Benghazi except a few deranged teabaggers who still think Obama's birth certificate is a forgery. This is as much a scandal as Whitewater or Clinton "selling nuke secrets to China!". While conspiracy theories are flying around in wingnut cyberspace and on Faux News, the rest of us are moving on.
This is actually becoming a problem that is not going away. Specifically someone heavily edited the Benghazi talking points but the White House is now denying they did it. So the question remains, who 'specifically' issued the order to edit the CIA report that Susan Rice used on the talk shows?Say Anything White House Claims They Didn't Edit Benghazi Talking Points » Say Anything
Big Bird. Or some other fictional character. It's not like this administration will take responsibility for anything that happens on their watch. Maybe GW Bush did so...
This is actually becoming a problem that is not going away. Specifically someone heavily edited the Benghazi talking points but the White House is now denying they did it. So the question remains, who 'specifically' issued the order to edit the CIA report that Susan Rice used on the talk shows?Say Anything White House Claims They Didn't Edit Benghazi Talking Points » Say Anything
Let me post the first comment to this blog piece that hasn't been read by any of the left leaners who have responded up to now. I think that even they can't answer to these words without their grandiose deflective attempts.
I'm trying to see where this gets us to the main problem........who told the military to stand down and leave American citizens to die......irregardless if it was a terrorist or a "spontaneous" event.......
Someone in the course of the 7 hrs attack repeatedly told the gunship in the air overhead, told the spec ops teams 2 hrs away, told F15's 45 minutes away to stand down.......
I will never stop wondering who gave the orders to just let those people die without trying to help them live and somebody in the White House gave that order. It is very obvious that Ms. Rice's lies were put to her by someone and surely the White House was involved in getting her set up on those 5 shows.
Petraeus told what seems to be the truth to me and he even talked about the various offices, etc that had to have seen this story before Rice told it the way she was instructed to do.
Who cares who told her the White House story? I want to know who gave the orders that day to allow those men to die. Since the State Department had a drone flying around and sending in its pictures of what was going on it had to be someone involved with the government, and very high up, at that.
Let me post the first comment to this blog piece that hasn't been read by any of the left leaners who have responded up to now. I think that even they can't answer to these words without their grandiose deflective attempts.
I'm trying to see where this gets us to the main problem........who told the military to stand down and leave American citizens to die......irregardless if it was a terrorist or a "spontaneous" event.......
Someone in the course of the 7 hrs attack repeatedly told the gunship in the air overhead, told the spec ops teams 2 hrs away, told F15's 45 minutes away to stand down.......
I will never stop wondering who gave the orders to just let those people die without trying to help them live and somebody in the White House gave that order. It is very obvious that Ms. Rice's lies were put to her by someone and surely the White House was involved in getting her set up on those 5 shows.
Petraeus told what seems to be the truth to me and he even talked about the various offices, etc that had to have seen this story before Rice told it the way she was instructed to do.
Who cares who told her the White House story? I want to know who gave the orders that day to allow those men to die. Since the State Department had a drone flying around and sending in its pictures of what was going on it had to be someone involved with the government, and very high up, at that.
Great post. Yes, someone specifically gave that order. Who was it?
This is actually becoming a problem that is not going away. Specifically someone heavily edited the Benghazi talking points but the White House is now denying they did it. So the question remains, who 'specifically' issued the order to edit the CIA report that Susan Rice used on the talk shows?Say Anything White House Claims They Didn't Edit Benghazi Talking Points » Say Anything
It's not going away, but no one in the MSM, except for FOX, is pushing very hard. And the WH can stonewall FOX because libs reflexively deride them and IMO most libs don't really want to know the truth, they just want this to go away.
Nothing will come of this till the day we see the editorial boards of the NYT and the WaPo call for honestly from this WH, but with the NYT and the WaPo distracting each other while butting over heads over management issues At Washington Post, Katharine Weymouth Struggles for Surer Footing - NYTimes.com it's unlikely we'll see anything from them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
