Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The left is having a conniption about banning guns...why aren't they screaming about banning cigarettes...the dirty little secret..."they luv the tax revenues"...
Cigarettes are not banned because they are not responsible for more than 440,000 deaths. In fact, there is no empirical evidence that cigarettes or smoking tobacco causes any illness whatsoever. The AHA is feeding you pure propaganda.
Cigarettes are not banned because they are not responsible for more than 440,000 deaths. In fact, there is no empirical evidence that cigarettes or smoking tobacco causes any illness whatsoever. The AHA is feeding you pure propaganda.
I am probably one of the more pro-Tobacco posters here, but lets be realistic, the fact is when you smoke you are trapping tar in your lungs and over the long term those carbon deposits do cause illness.
If you were thinking clearly, you'd have to acknowledge the difference between a cigarette and a firearm. I won't explain the difference; I know you can figure it out. You seem quite desperate to rationalize the lethal power of a firearm.
Cigarettes are not banned because they are not responsible for more than 440,000 deaths. In fact, there is no empirical evidence that cigarettes or smoking tobacco causes any illness whatsoever. The AHA is feeding you pure propaganda
Whether its true or not...why isn't the leftwing nut jobs having a conniption about banning cigarettes!!!...as i said before "they luv the tax revenues"...
If you were thinking clearly, you'd have to acknowledge the difference between a cigarette and a firearm. I won't explain the difference; I know you can figure it out. You seem quite desperate to rationalize the lethal power of a firearm.
The leftwing power brokers could care less about people...all they're worried about is their hold on power!!!
I am probably one of the more pro-Tobacco posters here, but lets be realistic, the fact is when you smoke you are trapping tar in your lungs and over the long term those carbon deposits do cause illness.
Then why is there no direct link between tobacco use and illness? Some people are adversely affected by tobacco use, while others are completely unaffected. There is no direct correlation, only a statistical correlation.
My god, but if you didn't have the voices in your head to argue with, what would you ever do with your computer?
Oh please..ive spoken to so many liberals who think all guns are evil and should be banned...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So true
