Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-31-2012, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,820,712 times
Reputation: 10789

Advertisements

Fox News, Conservatives, and Republicans bashed Obama throughout the presidential campaign for cutting 700 billion from Medicare.

Now with the fiscal cliff negotiations, the GOP says we must cut entitlement spending when they really mean Medicare. Why don't they just say, "We need to cut Medicare?"


New Trend: Entitlement Spending Tangle - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-31-2012, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
When republicans say "entitlement" they include Medicare and Social Security. But then they deny it because it doesn't help politically and use unemployment insurance etc to deflect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 09:52 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,532,112 times
Reputation: 25816
I'm hoping people have figured that out - but I'm afraid people are still thinking of those free 'Obamaphones" whenever the Repubs talk about 'entitlements.'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
I'm hoping people have figured that out - but I'm afraid people are still thinking of those free 'Obamaphones" whenever the Repubs talk about 'entitlements.'
You mean the Reaganphones?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
You didn't notice the change happening over the years ?

SS and medicare are now lumped in with TANF and other means tested programs.
They are all "entitlement programs" now whether you paid into them or not.

Americans are now "entitled" to government handouts and they blur the line defining programs you paid into vs programs you didn't. It's to eliminate the stigma of being poor you know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,673,869 times
Reputation: 9174
FICA is a forced savings account. How dare I take my money out of my forced savings account each month!

And believe me, I'm laughing at all the libbys while I do it.

And for those still to braindead to have comprehended, each month, a portion comes out of my forced savings account to pay for Medicare. Is that easy enough to understand? For liberals probably not. Here...let me break it down:

SS Check: $1500
Medicare Deduction: $300

Net: $1200

See how easy it is?

Somehow, I still think liberals won't get it. 2+2 is way too hard for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,820,712 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
FICA is a forced savings account. How dare I take my money out of my forced savings account each month!

And believe me, I'm laughing at all the libbys while I do it.

And for those still to braindead to have comprehended, each month, a portion comes out of my forced savings account to pay for Medicare. Is that easy enough to understand? For liberals probably not. Here...let me break it down:

SS Check: $1500
Medicare Deduction: $300

Net: $1200

See how easy it is?

Somehow, I still think liberals won't get it. 2+2 is way too hard for them.
The liberals have no problem with that. It is your Republicans, especially the tea partiers, who want to take away your Social Security and Medicare because you are no longer entitled to this entitlement. If the Republicans have their way, the funds you paid into these programs would be used for additional tax breaks for the wealthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 05:14 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,468,904 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Fox News, Conservatives, and Republicans bashed Obama throughout the presidential campaign for cutting 700 billion from Medicare.

Now with the fiscal cliff negotiations, the GOP says we must cut entitlement spending when they really mean Medicare. Why don't they just say, "We need to cut Medicare?"


New Trend: Entitlement Spending Tangle - YouTube
Better yet why don't you just admit your own candidate and his appointees are saying that.

Quote:
Lawmakers should not delay addressing the long-run financial challenges facing Social Security and Medicare. If they take action sooner rather than later, more options and more time will be available to phase in changes so that the public has adequate time to prepare. Earlier action will also help elected officials minimize adverse impacts on vulnerable populations, including lower-income workers and people already dependent on program benefits.
Trustees Report Summary

And, gosh, what sort of republican could be so callous and thoughtless as to recommend such draconian cuts or taxes on everyone?

Quote:
Timothy F. Geithner,
Secretary of the Treasury,
and Managing Trustee

Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary of Health
and Human Services,
and Trustee

Charles P. Blahous III,
Trustee

Hilda L. Solis,
Secretary of Labor,
and Trustee

Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of
Social Security,
and Trustee

Robert D. Reischauer, Trustee
And what does the SSA say about you feeling that you paid in and somehow it's yours no matter what anyone says?


Background to the Case:

Quote:
The fact that workers contribute to the Social Security program's funding through a dedicated payroll tax establishes a unique connection between those tax payments and future benefits. More so than general federal income taxes can be said to establish "rights" to certain government services. This is often expressed in the idea that Social Security benefits are "an earned right." This is true enough in a moral and political sense. But like all federal entitlement programs, Congress can change the rules regarding eligibility--and it has done so many times over the years. The rules can be made more generous, or they can be made more restrictive. Benefits which are granted at one time can be withdrawn, as for example with student benefits, which were substantially scaled-back in the 1983 Amendments.

There has been a temptation throughout the program's history for some people to suppose that their FICA payroll taxes entitle them to a benefit in a legal, contractual sense. That is to say, if a person makes FICA contributions over a number of years, Congress cannot, according to this reasoning, change the rules in such a way that deprives a contributor of a promised future benefit. Under this reasoning, benefits under Social Security could probably only be increased, never decreased, if the Act could be amended at all. Congress clearly had no such limitation in mind when crafting the law. Section 1104 of the 1935 Act, entitled "RESERVATION OF POWER," specifically said: "The right to alter, amend, or repeal any provision of this Act is hereby reserved to the Congress." Even so, some have thought that this reservation was in some way unconstitutional. This is the issue finally settled by Flemming v. Nestor.

In this 1960 Supreme Court decision Nestor's denial of benefits was upheld even though he had contributed to the program for 19 years and was already receiving benefits. Under a 1954 law, Social Security benefits were denied to persons deported for, among other things, having been a member of the Communist party. Accordingly, Mr. Nestor's benefits were terminated. He appealed the termination arguing, among other claims, that promised Social Security benefits were a contract and that Congress could not renege on that contract. In its ruling, the Court rejected this argument and established the principle that entitlement to Social Security benefits is not contractual right.
Social Security Online History Pages

Well gosh, that's just embarrassing. Look how silly you and your cohorts look now having defended Obama all the way back to FDR as if they were your savior...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Baldock, hertfordshire, England
768 posts, read 880,117 times
Reputation: 254
You fools.

Every other developed nation gets the same healthcare result for half the cost.


Starve the beast. Stop throwing money at it. You don't even realize who your abusers are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 05:18 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,468,904 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
FICA is a forced savings account. How dare I take my money out of my forced savings account each month!

And believe me, I'm laughing at all the libbys while I do it.

And for those still to braindead to have comprehended, each month, a portion comes out of my forced savings account to pay for Medicare. Is that easy enough to understand? For liberals probably not. Here...let me break it down:

SS Check: $1500
Medicare Deduction: $300

Net: $1200

See how easy it is?

Somehow, I still think liberals won't get it. 2+2 is way too hard for them.
But it's not a forced savings plan. It's a social insurance plan that can be changed in anyway congress sees necessary or it can be abolished at anytime and no you do not pass go and you don't collect anything if that's done.

Last edited by BigJon3475; 12-31-2012 at 05:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top