Do we really want this man to succeed Hillary Clinton? (enemies, generation)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Meh, at least come up with some new atrocity that Kerry supposedly committed. This harping on the same old same old shows a lack of imagination and is boring.
Rush must have had an off day today.
Was Rush on today? I wonder if you watched the video since you don't seem to have seen anything about
Carry trying to joke about Iraq and college kids. Maybe you just didn't let any facts get in your way.
I have never viewed John Kerry as a gifted negotiator, he is an egotistical man, who talks at people, not to them. Admittedly, he ran for president, but that does not make him a leader of men, hell, even the democrats know that, which is why he was never made Speaker Of The House, much less leader of the US senate. BTW, you do not need to be a member of the House of Rep. to be speaker.
Kerry has never been a leader, never been a spokesman, so why make him Sec of State?
Either way, it really does not matter who the Sec of State will be, since the idiot 0bama will be calling the shots.
I agree with you but Carry would surely agree with anything left leaning Obama wanted to do and surely he would be able to cover up things like Benghazigate better than Hillary will since I think she has a tendency to want to stick it to Obama with some truth from that. I just don't think enough Democrats want Carry to win for him to make it. I have ordered my Senators to stand up against him, have you?
I think Kerry's 2002 actions - voting in favor of the Iraq war resolution - are a lot more concerning than something which happened over forty years ago, when he was still in his twenties.
But don't you get it? Things people do in their 20's are very important.
Obama used to be friends with some wacky professors back in the day, so obviously he's a Communist.
Now, W. Bush being a complete frat boy drunk 20 years before he was president, well, that just doesn't matter.
In 1971, Hillary Clinton was working with avowed Communist attorney Robert Treuhaft.
You'd be hard-pressed to argue that disagreeing with a war that most Americans wanted to end by 1971, and which was already being wound down in 1971, is more of a disqualification than that.
But Obama had to make the Clintons feel good and I think that was the reason she was appointed to that job. Of course, Obama was heavily involved with Communists by the time he got into Chicago politics and that may have something to do with why he wanted to appoint her. I am talking about his affair with the New Party when he entered Illinois politics. The New Party was the Communist Party in that part of the world, I think.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,352 posts, read 54,527,600 times
Reputation: 40819
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
I have called my Senators to tell them that we do not want him and they should stop his appointment from happening. His actions in 1971 convinced most of us that he has no business in a job like Secretary of State. Is there anybody here who wants him for any reason other than politics?
His actions speaking out against what may well be the biggest foreign policy blunder in US history would seem to make him well qualified for SoS.
I'd also want him for the affect he has on McCarthyites, they deserve it.
But Obama had to make the Clintons feel good and I think that was the reason she was appointed to that job. Of course, Obama was heavily involved with Communists by the time he got into Chicago politics and that may have something to do with why he wanted to appoint her. I am talking about his affair with the New Party when he entered Illinois politics. The New Party was the Communist Party in that part of the world, I think.
I figured out why you don't have money for a vacation. The tin foil bill in your household must be ENORMOUS.
Have you checked under the bed to see if any of those commies crossed the border and got as far as Kansas?
I agree with you but Carry would surely agree with anything left leaning Obama wanted to do and surely he would be able to cover up things like Benghazigate better than Hillary will since I think she has a tendency to want to stick it to Obama with some truth from that. I just don't think enough Democrats want Carry to win for him to make it. I have ordered my Senators to stand up against him, have you?
I'm positive Kerry will not be serving the best interests of our nation, he will be serving the best interests of 0bama, himself and the democratic party, in that order. Kerry will be a loyal puppet to 0bama, that much is sure.
But don't you get it? Things people do in their 20's are very important.
Obama used to be friends with some wacky professors back in the day, so obviously he's a Communist.
Now, W. Bush being a complete frat boy drunk 20 years before he was president, well, that just doesn't matter.
Get it?
Good.
No mention of Carry's activities in 2002? I wonder why not. When you start talking about Bush it always smacks of deflection. Do you really know much about what Carry did in his military years and how he behaved? It seems not.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
